Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014219›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Genes, geology and germs: gut microbiota across a primate hybrid zone are explained by site soil properties, not host species.

Laura E Grieneisen, Marie J E Charpentier, Susan C Alberts, Ran Blekhman, Gideon Bradburd, Jenny Tung, Elizabeth A Archie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura E Grieneisen1 Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN 55455 , USA.
Marie J E Charpentier3 Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier, Université Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE , Montpellier , France.
Susan C Alberts4 Department of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC 27708 , USA.
Ran Blekhman1 Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, MN 55455 , USA.
Gideon Bradburd8 Department of Integrative Biology, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI 48824 , USA.
Jenny Tung4 Department of Biology, Duke University , Durham, NC 27708 , USA.
Elizabeth A Archie2 Department of Biology, University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame, IN 46556 , USA.

Funding

Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI James Moody · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Population Genomics of Host-Microbiome InteractionsR35GM128716 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ran Blekhman · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
A prospective, longitudinal perspective on gut microbiome aging and health in a non-human primate modelR21AG055777 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI ARCHIE, ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2018
$438k
Epigenetic Consequences of Social Status across the Life Span in a Primate ModelR21AG049936 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBERTS, SUSAN C., TUNG, JENNY · 2014 to 2015
$319k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG049936NIA NIH HHS R21 AG055777NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota in geographically isolated host populations are often distinct. These differences have been attributed to between-population differences in host behaviours, environments, genetics and geographical distance. However, which factors are most important remains unknown. Here, we fill this gap for baboons by leveraging information on 13 environmental variables from 14 baboon populations spanning a natural hybrid zone. Sampling across a hybrid zone allowed us to additionally test whether phylosymbiosis (codiversification between hosts and their microbiota) is detectable in admixed, closely related primates. We found little evidence of genetic effects: none of host genetic ancestry, host genetic relatedness nor genetic distance between host populations were strong predictors of baboon gut microbiota. Instead, gut microbiota were best explained by the baboons' environments, especially the soil's geologic history and exchangeable sodium. Indeed, soil effects were 15 times stronger than those of host-population F

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaHybridization, GeneticKenyaPapio anubisPapio cynocephalusSoilSoilgenetic effectshybrid zoneisolation by distancemicrobiomePapiospecies sorting

Identifiers

PMID31014219
PMCPMC6501927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.