Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014217›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

A phylogenomic framework, evolutionary timeline and genomic resources for comparative studies of decapod crustaceans.

Joanna M Wolfe, Jesse W Breinholt, Keith A Crandall, Alan R Lemmon, Emily Moriarty Lemmon, Laura E Timm, Mark E Siddall, Heather D Bracken-Grissom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome sequencing of3 Biotech · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanna M Wolfe1 Division of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute of Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History , New York, NY 10024 , USA.
Jesse W Breinholt4 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida , Gainesville, FL 32611 , USA.
Keith A Crandall6 Computational Biology Institute, The George Washington University , Ashburn, VA 20147 , USA.
Alan R Lemmon8 Department of Scientific Computing, Florida State University , Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306 , USA.
Emily Moriarty Lemmon9 Department of Biological Science, Florida State University , Tallahassee, FL 32306 , USA.
Laura E Timm10 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University , North Miami, FL 33181 , USA.
Mark E Siddall1 Division of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute of Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History , New York, NY 10024 , USA.
Heather D Bracken-Grissom10 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University , North Miami, FL 33181 , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprising over 15 000 living species, decapods (crabs, shrimp and lobsters) are the most instantly recognizable crustaceans, representing a considerable global food source. Although decapod systematics have received much study, limitations of morphological and Sanger sequence data have yet to produce a consensus for higher-level relationships. Here, we introduce a new anchored hybrid enrichment kit for decapod phylogenetics designed from genomic and transcriptomic sequences that we used to capture new high-throughput sequence data from 94 species, including 58 of 179 extant decapod families, and 11 of 12 major lineages. The enrichment kit yields 410 loci (greater than 86 000 bp) conserved across all lineages of Decapoda, more clade-specific molecular data than any prior study. Phylogenomic analyses recover a robust decapod tree of life strongly supporting the monophyly of all infraorders, and monophyly of each of the reptant, 'lobster' and 'crab' groups, with some results supporting pleocyemate monophyly. We show that crown decapods diverged in the Late Ordovician and most crown lineages diverged in the Triassic-Jurassic, highlighting a cryptic Palaeozoic history, and post-extinction diversification. New insights into decapod relationships provide a phylogenomic window into morphology and behaviour, and a basis to rapidly and cheaply expand sampling in this economically and ecologically significant invertebrate clade.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenomeTranscriptomeAnimalsDecapodaGenomicsPhylogenyanchored hybrid enrichmentCrustaceaDecapodaPancrustaceaphylogenomicssystematics

Identifiers

PMID31014217
PMCPMC6501934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.