Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31014004›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Return to Work Interventions for Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and a Methodological Critique.

Kristopher Lamore, Thomas Dubois, Ulrike Rothe, Matilde Leonardi, Isabelle Girard, Ulf Manuwald, Soja Nazarov, Fabiola Silvaggi, Erika Guastafierro, Chiara Scaratti and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of the needs and health-related quality of life domains relevant to people surviving cancer in Europe.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Non-medical interventions to enhance return to work for people with cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Well-Being at Work after Return to Work (RTW): A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Return to work experience on structural constraints and gendered differences among nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Socioeconomic differences in labour market attachment after breast cancer: a population-based matched cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kristopher LamoreInstitut National du Cancer (INCa), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. kristopher.lamore@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8878-2662
Thomas DuboisInstitut National du Cancer (INCa), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. tdubois@institutcancer.fr.
Ulrike RotheHealth Sciences/Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. ulrike.rothe@tu-dresden.de.
Matilde LeonardiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy. matilde.leonardi@istituto-besta.it.ORCID 0000-0003-0552-8923
Isabelle GirardInstitut National du Cancer (INCa), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. igirard@institutcancer.fr.
Ulf ManuwaldHealth Sciences/Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. ulf.manuwald@tu-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6240-9475
Soja NazarovHealth Sciences/Public Health, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. soja.nazarov@tu-dresden.de.
Fabiola SilvaggiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy. fabiola.silvaggi@istituto-besta.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-632X
Erika GuastafierroNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy. erika.guastafierro@istituto-besta.it.
Chiara ScarattiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy. chiara.scaratti@istituto-besta.it.
Thierry BretonInstitut National du Cancer (INCa), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. tbreton@institutcancer.fr.
Jérôme FoucaudInstitut National du Cancer (INCa), 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France. jfoucaud@institutcancer.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9246-7721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer patients are more at risk of being unemployed or having difficulties to return to work (RTW) compared to individuals without health concerns, and is thus a major public health issue. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and describe the interventions developed specifically to help cancer patients to RTW after treatment. Two researchers independently screened the articles for inclusion and Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklists were used to assess the methodology of the included studies. Ten manuscripts met the inclusion criteria. The type of studies were three quasi-experimental studies, three longitudinal studies, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a qualitative study. RTW interventions were conducted in or outside the hospital (

Indexed as

AdultCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNorwayQuality of LifeReturn to WorkUnited Kingdomcancerinterventionreturn to worksystematic reviewwork rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID31014004
PMCPMC6518012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.