Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31013993›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

The Security of Big Data in Fog-Enabled IoT Applications Including Blockchain: A Survey.

Noshina Tariq, Muhammad Asim, Feras Al-Obeidat, Muhammad Zubair Farooqi, Thar Baker, Mohammad Hammoudeh, Ibrahim Ghafir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stochastic Photoresponse-Driven Perovskite TRNGs for Secure Encryption Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Noshina TariqDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. i131502@nu.edu.pk.
Muhammad AsimDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. muhammad.asim@nu.edu.pk.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-7891
Feras Al-ObeidatCollege of Technological Innovation, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi 144534, UAE. Feras.Al-Obeidat@zu.ac.ae.
Muhammad Zubair FarooqiDepartment of Computer Science, National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan. zubair.farooqi@nu.edu.pk.
Thar BakerDepartment of Computer Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK. t.baker@ljmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-4873
Mohammad HammoudehSchool of Computing, Mathematics and Digital Technology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, UK. M.Hammoudeh@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1058-0996
Ibrahim GhafirFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, 60177 Brno, Czech Republic. ghafir@mail.muni.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of inter-connected devices in critical industries, such as healthcare and power grid, is changing the perception of what constitutes critical infrastructure. The rising interconnectedness of new critical industries is driven by the growing demand for seamless access to information as the world becomes more mobile and connected and as the Internet of Things (IoT) grows. Critical industries are essential to the foundation of today's society, and interruption of service in any of these sectors can reverberate through other sectors and even around the globe. In today's hyper-connected world, the critical infrastructure is more vulnerable than ever to cyber threats, whether state sponsored, criminal groups or individuals. As the number of interconnected devices increases, the number of potential access points for hackers to disrupt critical infrastructure grows. This new attack surface emerges from fundamental changes in the critical infrastructure of organizations technology systems. This paper aims to improve understanding the challenges to secure future digital infrastructure while it is still evolving. After introducing the infrastructure generating big data, the functionality-based fog architecture is defined. In addition, a comprehensive review of security requirements in fog-enabled IoT systems is presented. Then, an in-depth analysis of the fog computing security challenges and big data privacy and trust concerns in relation to fog-enabled IoT are given. We also discuss blockchain as a key enabler to address many security related issues in IoT and consider closely the complementary interrelationships between blockchain and fog computing. In this context, this work formalizes the task of securing big data and its scope, provides a taxonomy to categories threats to fog-based IoT systems, presents a comprehensive comparison of state-of-the-art contributions in the field according to their security service and recommends promising research directions for future investigations.

Indexed as

Big DataComputer SecurityDelivery of Health CareInternetHumansPrivacybig datablockchainedge computingfog computingInternet of Thingssecurity

Identifiers

PMID31013993
PMCPMC6515199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.