ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2019
A Novel Multi-Biomarker Assay for Non-Invasive Quantitative Monitoring of Kidney Injury.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04705766 (The KIDCOV Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The KIDCOV Study: ASSESSMENT of SARS-CoV-2 Without HOSPITALIZATION as a RISK FACTOR for ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Urinary Peptide and Proteomic Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- The applications of DNA methylation as a biomarker in kidney transplantation: a systematic review.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Pooled it
- Decoding the hallmarks of allograft dysfunction with a comprehensive pan-organ transcriptomic atlas.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Proteinuria and risk of ocular motor cranial nerve palsy: a nationwide population-based study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of cell-free DNA on kidney disease and intervention strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Molecular immune monitoring in kidney transplant rejection: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Article
- Biomarkers in Pediatric Nephrology-From Bedside to Bench and Back Again.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Extracellular vesicle-bound DNA in urine is indicative of kidney allograft injury.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2022Article
- Etiology of Persistent Microalbuminuria in Nigeria (P_MICRO study): protocol and study design.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Emerging Biomarkers for Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Identification of biomarkers of chronic kidney disease among kidney-derived proteins.Clinical proteomics · 2022Article
- The Most Promising Biomarkers of Allogeneic Kidney Transplant Rejection.Journal of immunology research · 2022Review
- A large staghorn stone diagnosed and managed in an asymptomatic patient using the "Kidney Injury Test (Kit)" spot urine assay: A case report.Urology case reports · 2021Article
- Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Transplantation as a Potential Rejection Biomarker: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- New Potential Biomarkers for Chronic Kidney Disease Management-A Review of the Literature.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Changes of protein levels in human urine reflect the dysregulation of signaling pathways of chronic kidney disease and its complications.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Proteinuria and Bilirubinuria as Potential Risk Indicators of Acute Kidney Injury during Running in Outpatient Settings.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Article
- Clusterin as a New Marker of Kidney Injury in Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation-A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Clinical and Analytical Validation of a Novel Urine-Based Test for the Detection of Allograft Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The current standard of care measures for kidney function, proteinuria, and serum creatinine (SCr) are poor predictors of early-stage kidney disease. Measures that can detect chronic kidney disease in its earlier stages are needed to enable therapeutic intervention and reduce adverse outcomes of chronic kidney disease. We have developed the Kidney Injury Test (KIT) and a novel KIT Score based on the composite measurement and validation of multiple biomarkers across a unique set of 397 urine samples. The test is performed on urine samples that require no processing at the site of collection and without target sequencing or amplification. We sought to verify that the pre-defined KIT test, KIT Score, and clinical thresholds correlate with established chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may provide predictive information on early kidney injury status above and beyond proteinuria and renal function measurements alone. Statistical analyses across six DNA, protein, and metabolite markers were performed on a subset of residual spot urine samples with CKD that met assay performance quality controls from patients attending the clinical labs at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) as part of an ongoing IRB-approved prospective study. Inclusion criteria included selection of patients with confirmed CKD and normal healthy controls; exclusion criteria included incomplete or missing information for sample classification, logistical delays in transport/processing of urine samples or low sample volume, and acute kidney injury. Multivariate logistic regression of kidney injury status and likelihood ratio statistics were used to assess the contribution of the KIT Score for prediction of kidney injury status and stage of CKD as well as assess the potential contribution of the KIT Score for detection of early-stage CKD above and beyond traditional measures of renal function. Urine samples were processed by a proprietary immunoprobe for measuring cell-free DNA (cfDNA), methylated cfDNA, clusterin, CXCL10, total protein, and creatinine. The KIT Score and stratified KIT Score Risk Group (high versus low) had a sensitivity and specificity for detection of kidney injury status (healthy or CKD) of 97.3% (95% CI: 94.6-99.3%) and 94.1% (95% CI: 82.3-100%). In addition, in patients with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 90), the KIT Score clearly identifies those with predisposing risk factors for CKD, which could not be detected by eGFR or proteinuria (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.