ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Permeability versus Design in TPMS Scaffolds.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Hydrodynamic Analysis and Optimization of Gyroid and Diamond Scaffolds with Functionally Graded Porosity.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Design and performance study of biomimetic bone scaffolds based on the fusion of triply periodic minimal surfaces.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Recent Developments in Novel TPMS Lattice Materials: Design Optimization, Performance Control, and Applications in Biomimetic Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Spatially distributed and interconnected porous architectures for dental implants.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
- Understanding the relationship between pore structure and properties of triply periodic minimal surface bone scaffolds.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Review
- Hybrid additive manufacturing for Zn-Mg casting for biomedical application.In vitro models · 2024Article
- Nanoparticles in Bone Regeneration: A Narrative Review of Current Advances and Future Directions in Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Review
- Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Function of Multi-Material Hierarchically Structured Scaffolds.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- Flow performance of porous implants with different geometry: Line, surface, and volume structures.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- Wall Shear Stress Analysis and Optimization in Tissue Engineering TPMS Scaffolds.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Additively Manufactured Scaffolds with Optimized Thickness Based on Triply Periodic Minimal Surface.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- PCL strut-like scaffolds appear superior to gyroid in terms of bone regeneration within a long bone large defect: AnFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- [Design of new gradient scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surfaces and study on its mechanical, permeability and tissue differentiation characteristics].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021Article
- Application of Computational Method in Designing a Unit Cell of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold: A Review.Polymers · 2021Review
- Mechanical properties and fluid permeability of gyroid and diamond lattice structures for intervertebral devices: functional requirements and comparative analysis.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2021Article
- An Algorithm to Optimize the Micro-Geometrical Dimensions of Scaffolds with Spherical Pores.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Assessing Porous Media Permeability in Non-Darcy Flow: A Re-Evaluation Based on the Forchheimer Equation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- In vivo bone regeneration assessment of offset and gradient melt electrowritten (MEW) PCL scaffolds.Biomaterials research · 2020Article
- Porous Scaffold Design for Additive Manufacturing in Orthopedics: A Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering are porous structures that serve as support for cellular growth and, therefore, new tissue formation. The present work assessed the influence of the porous architecture of triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) scaffolds on their macroscopic permeability behavior, combining numerical and experimental methods. The TPMS scaffolds considered were Schwartz D, Schwartz P, and Gyroid, which have been previously studied for bone tissue engineering, with 70% porosity. On the experimental side, these scaffolds were produced by MultiJet 3D printing and tested for fluid passage to calculate their permeability through Darcy's Law. On the numerical side, finite element (FE) models of the scaffolds were simulated on ABAQUS® for fluid passage under compression to assess potential fluid concentration spots. The outcomes revealed that the design of the unit cell had a noticeable effect on both calculated permeability and FE computed fluid flow velocity, regardless of the identical porosity, with the Gyroid scaffold having higher permeability and the Schwartz P a lower probability of fluid trapping. Schwartz D had the worst outcomes in both testing modalities, so these scaffolds would most likely be the last choice for promoting cell differentiation onto bone cells. Gyroid and Schwartz P would be up for selection depending on the application and targeted bone tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.