ArticlePloS one2019
Can nano-hydroxyapatite permeate the oral mucosa? A histological study using three-dimensional tissue models.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomimetic Strategies for Subsurface Enamel Remineralization: Depth-Dependent Effects of Biomimetic Agents Compared with Fluoride.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nanohydroxyapatite in dentistry: A comprehensive review.The Saudi dental journal · 2023Article
- Nano-hydroxyapatite improves intestinal absorption of acetazolamide (BCS Class IV drug)-but how?PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nano-hydroxyapatite is used in oral care products worldwide. But there is little evidence yet whether nano-hydroxyapatite can enter systemic tissues via the oral epithelium. We investigated histologically the ability of two types of nano-hydroxyapatite, SKM-1 and Mi-HAP, to permeate oral epithelium both with and without a stratum corneum, using two types of three-dimensional reconstituted human oral epithelium, SkinEthic HGE and SkinEthic HOE respectively with and without a stratum corneum. Both types of nano-hydroxyapatite formed aggregates in solution, but both aggregates and primary particles were much larger for SKM-1 than for Mi-HAP. Samples of each tissue model were exposed to SKM-1 and Mi-HAP for 24 h at concentrations ranging from 1,000 to 50,000 ppm. After treatment, paraffin sections from the samples were stained with Dahl or Von Kossa stains. We also used OsteoSense 680EX, a fluorescent imaging agent, to test for the presence of HAP in paraffin tissue sections for the first time. Our results for both types of nano-hydroxyapatite showed that the nanoparticles did not penetrate the stratum corneum in SkinEthic HGE samples and penetrated only the outermost layer of cells in SkinEthic HOE samples without stratum corneum, and no permeation into the deeper layers of the epithelium in either tissue model was observed. In the non-cornified model, OsteoSense 680EX staining confirmed the presence of nano-hydroxyapatite particles in both the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix of outermost cells, but not in the deeper layers. Our results suggest that the stratum corneum may act as a barrier to penetration of nano-hydroxyapatite into the oral epithelium. Moreover, since oral epithelial cell turnover is around 5-7 days, superficial cells of the non-keratinized mucosa in which nanoparticles are taken up are likely to be deciduated within that time frame. Our findings suggest that nano-hydroxyapatite is unlikely to enter systemic tissues via intact oral epithelium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.