Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31012933›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2019

Effect of Addition of an Intimate Partner Violence Intervention to a Nurse Home Visitation Program on Maternal Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Susan M Jack, Michael Boyle, Christine McKee, Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, C Nadine Wathen, Philip Scribano, Danielle Davidov, Diane McNaughton, Ruth O'Brien, Carolyn Johnston and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01372098 (Development and Evaluation of an Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence in the Context of Nurse Home Visits), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01372098 nacompletednot on this map

Development and Evaluation of an Intervention for Intimate Partner Violence in the Context of Nurse Home Visits

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2011 to 2015Enrolled492ConditionsDomestic ViolenceArmsNFP + IPV intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Children.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Susan M JackSchool of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michael BoyleDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Christine McKeeOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Marilyn Ford-GilboeArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
C Nadine WathenArthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Philip ScribanoThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Danielle DavidovDepartment of Emergency Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Diane McNaughtonDepartment of Community, Systems, and Mental Health Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Ruth O'BrienCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver.
Carolyn JohnstonNurse-Family Partnership National Service Office, Denver, Colorado.
Mariarosa GasbarroDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver.
Masako TanakaOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Melissa KimberOfford Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey CobenSchool of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
David L OldsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver.
Harriet L MacMillanDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health problem with significant adverse consequences for women and children. Past evaluations of a nurse home visitation program for pregnant women and first-time mothers experiencing social and economic disadvantage have not consistently shown reductions in IPV. Objective: To determine the effect on maternal quality of life of a nurse home visitation program augmented by an IPV intervention, compared with the nurse home visitation program alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster-based, single-blind, randomized clinical trial at 15 sites in 8 US states (May 2011-May 2015) enrolling 492 socially disadvantaged pregnant women (≥16 years) participating in a 2.5-year nurse home visitation program. Interventions: In augmented program sites (n = 229 participants across 7 sites), nurses received intensive IPV education and delivered an IPV intervention that included a clinical pathway to guide assessment and tailor care focused on safety planning, violence awareness, self-efficacy, and referral to social supports. The standard program (n = 263 participants across 8 sites) included limited questions about violence exposure and information for abused women but no standardized IPV training for nurses. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF; range, 0-400; higher score indicates better quality of life) obtained through interviews at baseline and every 6 months until 24 months after delivery. From 17 prespecified secondary outcomes, 7 secondary end points are reported, including scores on the Composite Abuse Scale, SPAN (Startle, Physiological Arousal, Anger, and Numbness), Prime-MD Patient Health Questionnaire, TWEAK (Tolerance/Worry About Drinking/Eye-Opener/Amnesia/C[K]ut Down on Drinking), Drug Abuse Severity Test, and the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (physical and mental health), version 2. Results: Among 492 participants enrolled (mean age, 20.4 years), 421 (86%) completed the trial. Quality of life improved from baseline to 24 months in both groups (change in WHOQOL-BREF scores from 299.5 [SD, 54.4] to 308.2 [SD, 52.6] in the augmented program group vs from 293.6 [SD, 56.4] to 316.4 [SD, 57.5] in the standard program group). Based on multilevel growth curve analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (modeled score difference, -4.9 [95% CI, -16.5 to 6.7]). There were no statistically significant differences between study groups in any of the secondary participant end points. There were no adverse events recorded in either group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among pregnant women experiencing social and economic disadvantage and preparing to parent for the first time, augmentation of a nurse home visitation program with a comprehensive IPV intervention, compared with the home visitation program alone, did not significantly improve quality of life at 24 months after delivery. These findings do not support the use of this intervention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01372098.

Indexed as

House CallsPregnant PeopleQuality of LifeAdolescentAdultBattered WomenFemaleGravidityHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceNurses, Community HealthPregnancySingle-Blind MethodYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31012933
PMCPMC6487547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.