Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31012864›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Developing a Physical Activity Ontology to Support the Interoperability of Physical Activity Data.

Hyeoneui Kim, Jessica Mentzer, Ricky Taira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Content and quality of physical activity ontologies: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Systematic design and data-driven evaluation of social determinants of health ontology (SDoHO).Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyeoneui KimSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5931-7286
Jessica MentzerSchool of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-4925
Ricky TairaDepartment of Radiological Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9754-8993

Funding

Predicting Diabetic Retinopathy from Risk Factor Data and Digital Retinal ImagesR01LM012309 · NLM · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI DASKIVICH, LAUREN, GEORGE, SHEBA · 2016 to 2022
$2.8M
Medical Imaging Informatics Training GrantT32EB016640 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, William Hsu · 2013 to 2026
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB016640NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity data provides important information on disease onset, progression, and treatment outcomes. Although analyzing physical activity data in conjunction with other clinical and microbiological data will lead to new insights crucial for improving human health, it has been hampered partly because of the large variations in the way the data are collected and presented.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop a Physical Activity Ontology (PACO) to support structuring and standardizing heterogeneous descriptions of physical activities.

methodsWe prepared a corpus of 1140 unique sentences collected from various physical activity questionnaires and scales as well as existing standardized terminologies and ontologies. We extracted concepts relevant to physical activity from the corpus using a natural language processing toolkit called Multipurpose Text Processing Tool. The target concepts were formalized into an ontology using Protégé (version 4). Evaluation of PACO was performed to ensure logical and structural consistency as well as adherence to the best practice principles of building an ontology. A use case application of PACO was demonstrated by structuring and standardizing 36 exercise habit statements and then automatically classifying them to a defined class of either sufficiently active or insufficiently active using FaCT++, an ontology reasoner available in Protégé.

resultsPACO was constructed using 268 unique concepts extracted from the questionnaires and assessment scales. PACO contains 225 classes including 9 defined classes, 20 object properties, 1 data property, and 23 instances (excluding 36 exercise statements). The maximum depth of classes is 4, and the maximum number of siblings is 38. The evaluations with ontology auditing tools confirmed that PACO is structurally and logically consistent and satisfies the majority of the best practice rules of ontology authoring. We showed in a small sample of 36 exercise habit statements that we could formally represent them using PACO concepts and object properties. The formal representation was used to infer a patient activity status category of sufficiently active or insufficiently active using the FaCT++ reasoner.

conclusionsAs a first step toward standardizing and structuring heterogeneous descriptions of physical activities for integrative data analyses, PACO was constructed based on the concepts collected from physical activity questionnaires and assessment scales. PACO was evaluated to be structurally consistent and compliant to ontology authoring principles. PACO was also demonstrated to be potentially useful in standardizing heterogeneous physical activity descriptions and classifying them into clinically meaningful categories that reflect adequacy of exercise.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingExerciseHumansexercisehealth information interoperabilityleisure activitiesterminology as topic

Identifiers

PMID31012864
PMCPMC6658272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.