Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31012250›Full record

ArticlePediatric transplantation2019

Use of genetic risks in pediatric organ transplantation listing decisions: A national survey.

Madeline Graf, Danton Char, Andrea Hanson-Kahn, David Magnus

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Parental Attitudes Toward Clinical Genomic Sequencing in Children With Critical Cardiac Disease.Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeline GrafDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0003-3087-3075
Danton CharDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Management, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Andrea Hanson-KahnDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
David MagnusStanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Funding

Ethical challenges of whole genome sequencing in care of critically ill childrenK01HG008498 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHAR, DANTON · 2015 to 2019
$1.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG008498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a limited supply of organs for all those who need them for survival. Thus, careful decisions must be made about who is listed for transplant. Studies show that manifesting genetic disease can impact listing eligibility. What has not yet been studied is the impact genetic risks for future disease have on a patient's chance to be listed. Surveys were emailed to 163 pediatric liver, heart, and kidney transplant programs across the United States to elicit views and experiences of key clinicians regarding each program's use of genetic risks (ie, predispositions, positive predictive testing) in listing decisions. Response rate was 42%. Sixty-four percent of programs have required genetic testing for specific indications prior to listing decisions. Sixteen percent have required it without specific indications, suggesting that genetic testing may be used to screen candidates. Six percent have chosen not to list patients with secondary findings or family histories of genetic conditions. In hypothetical scenarios, programs consider cancer predispositions and adult-onset neurological conditions to be relative contraindications to listing (61%, 17%, and 8% depending on scenario), and some consider them absolute contraindications (5% and 3% depending on scenario). Only 3% of programs have formal policies for these scenarios, but all consult genetic specialists at least "sometimes" for results interpretation. Our study reveals that pediatric transplant programs are using future onset genetic risks in listing decisions. As genetic testing is increasingly adopted into pediatric medicine, further study is needed to prevent possible inappropriate use of genetic information from impacting listing eligibility.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationPatient SelectionTissue and Organ ProcurementWaiting ListsAdultBreast NeoplasmsChildDecision MakingDisease ProgressionExomeFamily HealthFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, p53Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic Testingbioethicscontraindicationsgenetic predisposition testingorgan transplantationpediatric transplantationpredictive genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID31012250
PMCPMC6836721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.