ArticleBehavior research methods2019
Habit2: A stand-alone software solution for presenting stimuli and recording infant looking times in order to study infant development.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Perception of Intonation in Down Syndrome: Implications for Language Intervention.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
- Phonological Feature Abstraction Before 6 Months: Amodal Recognition of Place of Articulation Across Multiple Consonants.Developmental science · 2025Article
- Facial affect and arousal as a complement to gaze measures in infant speech sound perception studies.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
- Revisiting perceptual sensitivity to non-native speech in a diverse sample of bilinguals.Infant behavior & development · 2024Article
- Talker variability is not always the right noise: 14 month olds struggle to learn dissimilar word-object pairs under talker variability conditions.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2023Article
- The maluma/takete effect is late: No longitudinal evidence for shape sound symbolism in the first year.PloS one · 2023Article
- The threshold of rule productivity in infants.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- What is moving where? Infants' visual attention to dynamic objects may assist with processing of spatial relations.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Development of executive function-relevant skills is related to both neural structure and function in infants.Developmental science · 2022Article
- Talker variability shapes early word representations in English-learning 8-month-olds.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2022Article
- Linguistic and developmental influences on superordinate facial configuration categorization in infancy.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2021Article
- Examining Preverbal Infants' Ability to Map Labels to Facial Configurations.Affective science · 2021Article
- Learning non-adjacent rules and non-adjacent dependencies from human actions in 9-month-old infants.PloS one · 2021Article
- The Development of Negative Event-Emotion Matching in Infancy: Implications for Theories in Affective Science.Affective science · 2020Article
- Statistical Learning in Late Talkers and Normal Peers.Advanced biomedical research · 2020Article
- Developmental change in English-learning children's interpretations of salient pitch contours in word learning.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant StudiesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many aspects of infant development are assessed using infant looking times to visual and audiovisual stimuli. In this article, we describe a stand-alone software package that allows simultaneous stimulus presentation to infants and recording of their looking times via a keypress by a human observer. The software was developed to run both on 64-bit Intel-based Macs running Mac OS/X 10.10 (Yosemite) or later and on 64-bit Windows 7 and 10. It can present a variety of visual and/or auditory stimuli; is customizable with respect to how trials are initiated, how trial lengths are defined, and the phases of the experiment; and can be used to record looking times online or after the fact, as well as to assess the reliability of coding. The software is freely available at http://habit.ucdavis.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.