SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2019
Understanding the Mentoring Environment Through Thematic Analysis of the Learning Environment in Medical Education: a Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Educational roles as a continuum of mentoring's role in medicine - a systematic review and thematic analysis of educational studies from 2000 to 2018.BMC medical education · 2019Pooled it
- Preventive trial-and-error model is associated with improved breech delivery skills and training transfer in midwifery interns.iScience · 2026Article
- A systematic scoping review of mentor training in medical education between 2000 and 2024.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- The impact of mentoring relationships on professional identity formation in medical education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- A systematic scoping review of mentoring support on professional identity formation.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- A scoping review of Fit in medical education: a guaranteed success, or a threat to inclusivity?Canadian medical education journal · 2024Article
- Peer mentorship and professional identity formation: an ecological systems perspective.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Mentoring as a complex adaptive system - a systematic scoping review of prevailing mentoring theories in medical education.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Article
- Linking the choice of the class format and preclass learning experiences sheds light on a step further in blended medical education.Medical education online · 2023Article
- Effect of mentorship and a mHealth application in updating provider skills and knowledge in maternal and newborn care in two informal settlements of Nairobi.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Assessing the effects of a mentoring program on professional identity formation.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Professional identity formation amongst peer-mentors in a research-based mentoring programme.BMC medical education · 2023Review
- Agile Mentorship: A Longitudinal Exploratory Analysis.ATS scholar · 2023Article
- Overshadowed by shadowing: exploring how Canadian medical students experience shadowing.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Understanding mentoring relationships between mentees, peer and senior mentors.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- The role of mentoring, supervision, coaching, teaching and instruction on professional identity formation: a systematic scoping review.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Rearrangement of mentoring components for Student Achievement of medical universities.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022Article
- Mentoring in palliative medicine in the time of covid-19: a systematic scoping review : Mentoring programs during COVID-19.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- A call to advance mentorship in continuing professional development.Canadian medical education journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMentoring's success has been attributed to individualised matching, holistic mentoring relationships (MRs) and personalised mentoring environments (MEs). Whilst there is growing data on matching and MRs, a dearth of ME data has hindered development of mentoring programme. Inspired by studies likening MEs to learning environments (LEs) and data highlighting common characteristics between the two, this systematic review scrutinises reports on LEs to extrapolate the findings to the ME context to provide a better understanding of ME and their role in the mentoring process.
methodsUsing identical search strategies, 6 reviewers carried out independent literature reviews of LEs in clinical medicine published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2015 using PubMed, ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar and Scopus databases. Braun and Clarke's (2006) approach to thematic analysis was adopted to circumnavigate LE's evolving, context-specific, goal-sensitive, learner-tutor relationally dependent nature.
resultsA total of 4574 abstracts were identified, 90 articles were reviewed, and 58 full-text articles were thematically analysed. The two themes identified were LE structure and LE culture. LE structure regards the framework that guides interactions within the LE. LE culture concerns the values and practices influencing learner-tutor-host organisation interactions. DISCUSSION: LE is the product of culture and structure that influence and are influenced by the tutor-learner-host organisation relationship. LE structure guides the evolving tutor-learner-host organisation relationship whilst the LE culture nurtures it and oversees the LE structure. Similarities between LEs and MEs allow LE data to inform programme designers of ME's role in mentoring's success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.