Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011949›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2019

Imaging the effects of age on proactive control in healthy adults.

Sien Hu, Manna Job, Samantha K Jenks, Herta H Chao, Chiang-Shan R Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sien HuDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Oswego, SUNY Oswego, 407 Mahar Hall, Oswego, NY, 13126, USA. sien.hu@oswego.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-4389
Manna JobDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Oswego, SUNY Oswego, 407 Mahar Hall, Oswego, NY, 13126, USA.
Samantha K JenksDepartment of Psychology, State University of New York at Oswego, SUNY Oswego, 407 Mahar Hall, Oswego, NY, 13126, USA.
Herta H ChaoDepartment of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Chiang-Shan R LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
State University of New York at Oswego · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Cognitive control and cocaine dependence: thalamic noradrenergic processesR01DA023248 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHIANG-SHAN RAY · 2008 to 2018
$4.0M
Neurocognitive Changes from Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer PatientsR01CA218501 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAO, HERTA HUEY-AN · 2018 to 2023
$1.9M
Cerebral Correlates of Early Habitual DrinkingR01AA021449 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHIANG-SHAN RAY · 2013 to 2017
$1.2M
Aging and cerebral regulation of physiological responses to social emotionsR21MH113134 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LI, CHIANG-SHAN RAY · 2017 to 2018
$397k
Effects of ADT on motivation and emotion function in prostate cancer patients: longitudinal imaging and predictionI01CX001301 · VA · VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI Herta Huey-An Chao · 2017 to 2026
–
CSRD VA I01 CX001301NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218501NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021449NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA023248NIH HHS AA021449NIH HHS CA218501NIH HHS DA023248NIH HHS MH113134NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH113134VA Merit Award CX001301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has reported reduced efficiency in reactive inhibition, along with reduced brain activations, in older adults. The current study investigated age-related behavioral and neural changes in proactive inhibition, and whether age may influence the relationship between proactive and reactive inhibition. One-hundred-and-forty-nine adults (18 to 72 years) underwent fMRI while performing a stop signal task (SST). Proactive inhibition was defined by the sequential effect, the correlation between the estimated probability of stop signal - p(Stop) - and go trial reaction time (goRT). P(Stop) was estimated trial by trial with a Bayesian belief model; reactive inhibition was defined by the stop signal reaction time (SSRT). Behaviorally the magnitude of sequential effect was not correlated with age, replicating earlier reports of spared proactive control in older adults. Age was associated with greater activations to p(Stop) in the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), paracentral lobule, superior parietal lobule, and cerebellum, and activations to goRT in the inferior occipital gyrus (IOG). Granger Causality analysis demonstrated that the PFC Granger caused IOG, with the PFC-IOG connectivity significantly correlated with p(Stop) in older but not younger adults. These findings suggest that the PFC and IOG activations and PFC-IOG connectivity may compensate for proactive control during aging. In contrast, while the activations of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and caudate head to p(Stop) were negatively correlated with SSRT, relating proactive to reactive control, these activities did not vary with age. These findings highlighted distinct neural processes underlying proactive inhibition and limited neural plasticity to support cognitive control in the aging brain.

Indexed as

AgingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainFemaleFrontal LobeHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleParietal LobePrefrontal CortexReaction TimeAgingfMRIPrefrontal cortexProactive controlStop signal task

Identifiers

PMID31011949
PMCPMC6812594
OpenAlexW2942091349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.