Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011903›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2019

A Survey of the Complex General Surgical Oncology Fellowship Programs Regarding Applicant Selection and Rank.

Michael M Wach, Reed I Ayabe, Samantha M Ruff, Michael D'Angelica, Sean P Dineen, Elizabeth G Grubbs, David Shibata, Lawrence Shirley, Matthew J Weiss, Jeremy L Davis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Michael M WachSurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Reed I AyabeSurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Samantha M RuffSurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael D'AngelicaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sean P DineenH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Elizabeth G GrubbsMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
David ShibataUniversity of Tennessee-Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Lawrence ShirleyOhio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Matthew J WeissJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jeremy L DavisSurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jonathan M HernandezSurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. jonathan.hernandez@nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Evaluating outcomes for patients with primary-metastatic gastrointestinal cancerZIABC011861 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HERNANDEZ, JONATHAN · 2019 to 2025
$166k
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is significant demand for training in Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) fellowships. Previous work has explored objective quantitative metrics of applicants that matriculated to CGSO fellowships; however, ambiguity remains concerning academic benchmarks and qualitative factors that impact matriculation. STUDY

designA web-based survey was sent to each ACGME/SSO-approved CGSO fellowship training program. The survey was comprised of 24 questions in various forms, including dichotomous, ranked, and five-point Likert scale questions.

resultsTwenty-nine of 30 program directors (97%) submitted complete survey responses, representing 64 of the 65 CGSO fellowship positions (99%) currently offered. Programs received a mean of 73 applications per cycle (range 50-125) and granted a mean of 26 interviews (range 2-45). Seventy-two percent of programs had an established benchmark for ABSITE score percentile before offering a candidate an interview, with 62% of those programs setting that benchmark above the 50

conclusionsAfter established academic benchmarks have been met, a multitude of factors influences ranking of applicants to the CGSO fellowship, most of which are assessed at the interview.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesFellowships and ScholarshipsHumansInternship and ResidencyNeoplasmsSchool Admission CriteriaSurgeonsSurgical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID31011903
PMCPMC6684844
OpenAlexW2940974801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.