Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011863›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Safety and efficacy of magnetic anchoring electrode-assisted irreversible electroporation for gastric tissue ablation.

Fenggang Ren, Qingshan Li, Liangshuo Hu, Xiaopeng Yan, Zhongyang Gao, Jing Zhang, Weiman Gao, Zhe Zhang, Pengkang Chang, Xue Chen and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fenggang RenNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-9279
Qingshan LiNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Liangshuo HuNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Xiaopeng YanNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Zhongyang GaoNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Digestive Disease and Gastrointestinal Motility Research Room, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 157, Xiwu Road, Xi'an, 710004, China.
Weiman GaoNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Zhe ZhangNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Pengkang ChangNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Xue ChenNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Dake ChuNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Rongqian WuNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Yi LvNational Local Joint Engineering Research Center for Precision Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 76, West Yanta Road, Xi'an, 710061, China. luyi169@126.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3636-6664
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIrreversible electroporation (IRE) is an emerging tissue ablation technique, which is safe for sites where thermal-basis techniques are not suitable. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of magnetic anchoring electrode (MAE)-assisted IRE for normal gastric tissue ablation in a rabbit model.

methodsIRE (500 V, 100 μs, 99 pulses, 1 Hz) of the gastric wall was performed in 24 adult New Zealand rabbits with a novel catheter-mounted MAE with fluoroscopy and a surgical approach. Procedure time, procedure-related bleeding, perforation, and other complications were recorded. Animals were sacrificed at 30 min, 1 day, 3 days, 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days post-IRE. The stomach was removed en bloc, and the diameter of each lesion was measured. Histopathological analyses by Hematoxylin-Eosin (H&E), masson trichrome, alpha-smooth muscle action (α-SMA), and terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling (TUNEL) were performed.

resultsGastric tissue ablation with MAE-assisted IRE was successfully performed without any interruption. No perforation or bleeding was observed during IRE or throughout the follow-up period. A demarcated hemorrhage was found in the ablated area upon gross examination. H&E staining showed complete cell death with inflammatory infiltration, edema, and hemorrhaging. TUNEL presented diffuse positive cells in the ablated area. The tissue scaffold was well preserved without damage as indicated by Masson trichrome staining. Ulceration was observed starting from 3 days post-IRE. The mucosal layer was gradually recovered and regenerated within 14-28 days. No other complication was observed post-IRE.

conclusionsMAE-assisted IRE is safe and effective for normal gastric tissue ablation and the gastric wall recovered in 14-28 days post-IRE.

Indexed as

ElectrodesMagneticsAblation TechniquesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectroporationGastric MucosaMagnetic PhenomenaRabbitsStaining and LabelingStomachGastric tissue ablationIrreversible electroporationMagnetic anchoringPulsed electric fields

Identifiers

PMID31011863
OpenAlexW2941549040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.