Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011812›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2020

Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in people with schizophrenia: a 4-year follow-up.

Ruey Chen, Tsan-Hon Liou, Nae-Fang Miao, Kwang-Hwa Chang, Chia-Feng Yen, Hua-Fang Liao, Wen-Chou Chi, Kuei-Ru Chou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ruey ChenDepartment of Nursing, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Tsan-Hon LiouDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Nae-Fang MiaoPost-Baccalaureate Program in Nursing, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Kwang-Hwa ChangDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chia-Feng YenDepartment of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, ROC.
Hua-Fang LiaoTaiwan Society of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Wen-Chou ChiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC. y6312002@gmail.com.
Kuei-Ru ChouDepartment of Nursing, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. kueiru@tmu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4882-3503
Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWChung Shan Medical University Hospital · TWNational Taiwan University · TWTaipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWTzu Chi University · TWWan Fang Hospital · TW

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare M03F4037Ministry of Health and Welfare M04F4027Ministry of Health and Welfare M05F5044Ministry of Health and Welfare M06F4035Ministry of Health and Welfare M07F5193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the changes of people with schizophrenia disability in Taiwan who receive routine treatments under the current mental healthcare system. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) was used to assess and track changes in the degree of disability in people with schizophrenia before and after 4 years of follow-up. Data on 4497 people with schizophrenia were acquired from the Taiwan Data Bank of Persons with Disability. The WHODAS 2.0 was used for disability assessment, and the chi-square test, logistic regression and generalised estimating equations were adopted for statistical analysis. People with schizophrenia exhibited improvement in cognition, mobility and participation among the six domains as well as in the overall score. The degree of disability in all domains remained mild to moderate among people aged 18-64 years; the degree of disability in cognition declined from moderate to severe among patients aged ≥65 years. The degree of disability in all domains remained mild to moderate among people with mild to moderate impairment; among those with severe impairment, the degree of disability in the domains of cognition and life activities declined from moderate to severe and the degree of disability in the domain of mobility declined from mild to moderate. Community-dwelling patients exhibited less degree of disability in all domains than their institutionalised peers. Early detection and treatment and an emphasis on communication and social problem-solving skills in rehabilitation programmes are recommended for people with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationDisease ProgressionPersons with Psychiatric DisordersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesWorld Health OrganizationAdolescentAdultCognitive DysfunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSchizophreniaSeverity of Illness IndexTaiwanFollow-upNational mental healthcare systemSchizophreniaWHODAS 2.0

Identifiers

PMID31011812
OpenAlexW2941575235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.