Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011713›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2019

Platelet function testing at low platelet counts: When can you trust your analysis?

Niklas Boknäs, Ankit S Macwan, Anna L Södergren, Sofia Ramström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Experimental conditions shapeFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  5. In vitro Hemostatic Functions of Cold-Stored Platelets.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Platelet function testing at low platelet counts: When can you trust your analysis?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Niklas BoknäsDepartment of Haematology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Linköping University Linköping Sweden.
Ankit S MacwanDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Linköping University Linköping Sweden.
Anna L SödergrenDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Linköping University Linköping Sweden.
Sofia RamströmDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Linköping University Linköping Sweden.
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough flow cytometry is often brought forward as a preferable method in the setting of thrombocytopenia, the relative effects of low sample counts on results from flow cytometry-based platelet function testing (FC-PFT) in comparison with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) has not been reported.

objectivesTo compare the effects of different sample platelet counts (10, 50, 100, and 200 × 10

methodsPlatelets were stimulated with two commonly used platelet agonists (ADP [6.5 μmol L

resultsFor FC, P-selectin exposure and PAC-1 binding was reduced at 10 × 10

conclusionsAlthough FC-PFT is generally preferable to aggregometry-based PFTs in situations with low sample platelet counts, a careful optimization of experimental parameters is still required in order to eliminate platelet count-related effects.

Indexed as

platelet activationplatelet aggregationplatelet countplatelet function teststhrombocytopenia

Identifiers

PMID31011713
PMCPMC6462761
OpenAlexW2923095864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.