Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011664›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

#WomenWhoCurie: Leveraging Social Media to Promote Women in Radiation Oncology.

Ashley A Albert, Miriam A Knoll, Kaleigh Doke, Adrianna Masters, Anna Lee, Laura Dover, Courtney Hentz, Lindsay Puckett, Chelain R Goodman, Virginia W Osborn and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashley A AlbertUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Miriam A KnollJohn Theurer Cancer Center (Hackensack Meridian Health-MSKCC Partnership), Hackensack, New Jersey.
Kaleigh DokeUniversity of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Adrianna MastersWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Anna LeeSUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
Laura DoverUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Courtney HentzLoyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois.
Lindsay PuckettMedical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin.
Chelain R GoodmanNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Virginia W OsbornElmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, New York.
Parul BarryRush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Reshma JagsiUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proportion of female trainees in radiation oncology has generally declined despite increasing numbers of female medical students; as a result, radiation oncology is among the bottom 5 specialties in terms of the percentage of female applicants. Recently, social media has been harnessed as a tool to bring recognition to underrepresented groups within medicine and other fields. Inspired by the wide-reaching social media campaign of #ILookLikeASurgeon to promote female physicians, members of the Society for Women in Radiation Oncology penned a new hashtag and launched the #WomenWhoCurie social media campaign on Marie Curie's birthday November 7th, as part of their strategy to raise public awareness. From November 6, 2018 until November 10, 2018, the #WomenWhoCurie hashtag delivered 1,135,000 impressions, including 408 photos from all over the world including United States, Spain, Canada, France, Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Japan, the Netherlands, India, Ecuador, Panama, Brazil, and Nigeria. Alongside continued gender disparity research, social media should continue to be used as a tool to engage the community and spur conversations to formulate solutions for gender inequity.

Identifiers

PMID31011664
PMCPMC6460226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.