Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011589›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019

Potential for Molecular Testing for Group A Streptococcus to Improve Diagnosis and Management in a High-Risk Population: A Prospective Study.

Anna P Ralph, Deborah C Holt, Sharifun Islam, Joshua Osowicki, David E Carroll, Steven Y C Tong, Asha C Bowen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of Group AThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Streptococcal Serology Reference Intervals in an Australian Pediatric Cohort.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Capture of Group ABioengineering & translational medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anna P RalphMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University.
Deborah C HoltMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University.
Sharifun IslamMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University.
Joshua OsowickiTropical Diseases, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, and Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of General Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne.
David E CarrollDivision of Medicine, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory.
Steven Y C TongMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University.
Asha C BowenMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University.
Charles Darwin University · AUMenzies School of Health Research · AUPeter Doherty Institute · AURoyal Darwin Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn high-burden settings, guidelines recommend antibiotic treatment for all suspected group A

methodsThis was a prospective study of the Xpert Xpress Strep A (Cepheid) molecular test compared with culture of throat swab samples collected at a referral hospital in northern Australia. Demographic and clinical data and results of streptococcal serology and culture were collected.

resultsOf 164 throat swab samples, 145 (88%) were eligible for inclusion; 49 (34%) were molecular test positive and 24 (17%) were culture positive for GAS. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the molecular test versus culture were 100.0%, 79.3%, 48.8%, and 100.0%, respectively. Among 25 samples testing positive with the molecular test and negative with culture, group C or G streptococci were cultured in 2, and a plausible clinical explanation, such as pharyngotonsillitis, or rheumatic fever with positive results of streptococcal serology, was apparent in 19 instances. In 25 patients with rheumatic fever or poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis diagnoses, molecular testing nearly trebled the detection of GAS in throat swab samples, from 3 (12%) detected with culture to 8 (32%) detected with molecular testing. Reasons for "false-positive" molecular test results could include the presence of GAS below the threshold of culture detection or persistence of nonviable organisms after infection.

conclusionImplementation of molecular testing could improve antibiotic use in this high-burden setting. The incremental yield in poststreptococcal syndromes, by which time cultures are negative, has high potential in the diagnostic workup of autoimmune poststreptococcal syndromes and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Group A Streptococcusmolecular testpharyngotonsillitispoint-of-care testrheumatic fever

Identifiers

PMID31011589
PMCPMC6469435
OpenAlexW2917377404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.