Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011576›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2019

Effects of Home-Based Robotic Therapy Involving the Single-Joint Hybrid Assistive Limb Robotic Suit in the Chronic Phase of Stroke: A Pilot Study.

Koichi Hyakutake, Takashi Morishita, Kazuya Saita, Hiroyuki Fukuda, Etsuji Shiota, Yasuki Higaki, Tooru Inoue, Yoshinari Uehara

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Koichi HyakutakeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takashi MorishitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0789-7776
Kazuya SaitaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki FukudaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Etsuji ShiotaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yasuki HigakiGraduate School of Sports and Health Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tooru InoueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshinari UeharaGraduate School of Sports and Health Sciences, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6075-7329
Fukuoka University · JPFukuoka University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRobotic therapy has drawn attention in the rehabilitation field including home-based rehabilitation. A previous study has reported that home-based therapy could be more effective for increasing upper limb activity than facility-based therapy. The single-joint hybrid assistive limb (HAL-SJ) is an exoskeleton robot developed according to the interactive biofeedback theory, and several studies have shown its effectiveness for upper limb function in stroke patients. A study of home-based robotic therapy has shown to enhance rehabilitation effectiveness for stroke patient with a paretic upper limb. However, home-based therapy involving a HAL-SJ in stroke patients with paretic upper limbs has not been investigated. The present study aimed to investigate paretic upper limb activity and function with home-based robotic therapy involving a HAL-SJ in stroke patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA home-based robotic therapy program involving a HAL-SJ was performed for 30 min per session followed by standard therapy for 30 min per session, 2 times a week, for 4 weeks (i.e., completion of all 8 sessions involved 8 h of rehabilitation), at home. After the intervention, patients were followed up by telephone and home visits for 8 weeks. The paretic upper limb activity and function were assessed using the Motor Activity Log (MAL; amount of use (AOU)), arm triaxial accelerometry (laterality index (LI)), the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), and the action research arm test (ARAT), at baseline and week 4 and week 12 after the start of training.

resultsThe study included 10 stroke patients (5 men; mean age, 61.1 ± 7.1 years). The AOU scores and LI significantly improved at week 4 after the start of training (

conclusionHome-based robotic therapy combined with conventional therapy could be a valuable approach for increasing paretic upper limb activity and maintaining paretic upper limb function in the chronic phase of stroke.

Indexed as

AgedExoskeleton DeviceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityPilot ProjectsRecovery of FunctionRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresStrokeStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID31011576
PMCPMC6442446
OpenAlexW2921638726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.