ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2019
Recursive Motif Analyses Identify Brain Epigenetic Transcription Regulatory Modules.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenome-850K-wide profiling reveals peripheral blood differential methylation in term low birth weight.Epigenomics · 2024Article
- Review
- DNA Methylation Regulates Transcription Factor-Specific Neurodevelopmental but Not Sexually Dimorphic Gene Expression Dynamics in Zebra Finch Telencephalon.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- NRF2-Related Epigenetic Modifications in Cardiac and Vascular Complications of Diabetes Mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Epigenetic regulation of neuronal cell specification inferred with single cell "Omics" data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification modulating the structure of DNA molecule and the interactions with its binding proteins. Accumulating large-scale methylation data motivates the development of analytic tools to facilitate methylome data mining. One critical phenomenon associated with dynamic DNA methylation is the altered DNA binding affinity of transcription factors, which plays key roles in gene expression regulation. In this study, we conceived an algorithm to predict epigenetic regulatory modules through recursive motif analyses on differentially methylated loci. A two-step procedure was implemented to first group differentially methylated loci into clusters according to their correlations in methylation profiles and then to repeatedly identify the transcription factor binding motifs significantly enriched in each cluster. We applied this tool on methylome datasets generated for mouse brains which have a lack of DNA demethylation enzymes TET1 or TET2. Compared with wild type control, the differentially methylated CpG sites identified in TET1 knockout mouse brains differed significantly from those determined for TET2 knockout. Transcription factors with zinc finger DNA binding domains including Egr1, Zic3, and Zeb1 were predicted to be associated with TET1 mediated brain methylome programming, while Lhx family members with Homeobox domains were predicted to be associated with TET2 function. Interestingly, genomic loci from a co-methylated cluster often host motifs for transcription factors sharing the same DNA binding domains. Altogether, our study provided a systematic approach for epigenetic regulatory module identification and will help throw light on the interplay of DNA methylation and transcription factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.