Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011205›Full record

Trial reportNature medicine2019

Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial.

Jordi Rodon, Jean-Charles Soria, Raanan Berger, Wilson H Miller, Eitan Rubin, Aleksandra Kugel, Apostolia Tsimberidou, Pierre Saintigny, Aliza Ackerstein, Irene Braña and 15 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01856296 (WINTHER), which is not on this map. Cited by 335 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
335citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01856296 nacompletednot on this map

WINTHER: A Study to Select Rational Therapeutics Based on the Analysis of Matched Tumor and Normal Biopsies in Subjects With Advanced Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorGustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand ParisRan2013 to 2019Enrolled303ConditionsMetastatic CancerArmsBiopsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

335 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Claudin 18.2 Targeting: A Pan-Cancer Perspective.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

275 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Jordi RodonVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Jean-Charles SoriaGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Raanan BergerChaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Wilson H MillerSegal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, QCROC-Quebec Cancer Consortium and Rossy Cancer Network, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Eitan RubinBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-4005
Aleksandra KugelBen-Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel.
Apostolia TsimberidouDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Pierre SaintignyCentre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France.
Aliza AckersteinChaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Irene BrañaVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Yohann LoriotGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Mohammad AfsharAriana Pharmaceuticals, Paris, France.
Vincent MillerFoundation Medicine Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Fanny WunderWorldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Association-WIN Consortium, Villejuif, France.
Catherine BressonWorldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Association-WIN Consortium, Villejuif, France.
Jean-François MartiniPfizer Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.
Jacques RaynaudARC Foundation for Cancer Research, Villejuif, France.
John MendelsohnWorldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Association-WIN Consortium, Villejuif, France.
Gerald BatistSegal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, QCROC-Quebec Cancer Consortium and Rossy Cancer Network, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Amir OnnChaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.
Josep TaberneroVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2495-8139
Richard L SchilskyWorldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Association-WIN Consortium, Villejuif, France.
Vladimir LazarWorldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Association-WIN Consortium, Villejuif, France.
J Jack LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5469-9214
Razelle KurzrockWorldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Association-WIN Consortium, Villejuif, France. rkurzrock@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4110-1214

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jesse Nodora · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine focuses on DNA abnormalities, but not all tumors have tractable genomic alterations. The WINTHER trial ( NCT01856296 ) navigated patients to therapy on the basis of fresh biopsy-derived DNA sequencing (arm A; 236 gene panel) or RNA expression (arm B; comparing tumor to normal). The clinical management committee (investigators from five countries) recommended therapies, prioritizing genomic matches; physicians determined the therapy given. Matching scores were calculated post-hoc for each patient, according to drugs received: for DNA, the number of alterations matched divided by the total alteration number; for RNA, expression-matched drug ranks. Overall, 303 patients consented; 107 (35%; 69 in arm A and 38 in arm B) were evaluable for therapy. The median number of previous therapies was three. The most common diagnoses were colon, head and neck, and lung cancers. Among the 107 patients, the rate of stable disease ≥6 months and partial or complete response was 26.2% (arm A: 23.2%; arm B: 31.6% (P = 0.37)). The patient proportion with WINTHER versus previous therapy progression-free survival ratio of >1.5 was 22.4%, which did not meet the pre-specified primary end point. Fewer previous therapies, better performance status and higher matching score correlated with longer progression-free survival (all P < 0.05, multivariate). Our study shows that genomic and transcriptomic profiling are both useful for improving therapy recommendations and patient outcome, and expands personalized cancer treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31011205
PMCPMC6599610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.