Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31011046›Full record

ReviewGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2017

A Review of Frailty Syndrome and Its Physical, Cognitive and Emotional Domains in the Elderly.

Mina Khezrian, Phyo K Myint, Christopher McNeil, Alison D Murray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mina KhezrianAberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. mina.khezrian@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9730-0787
Phyo K MyintInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. phyo.myint@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3852-6158
Christopher McNeilAberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. c.mcneil@abdn.ac.uk.
Alison D MurrayAberdeen Biomedical Imaging Centre, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. a.d.murray@abdn.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrailty, a very important complication of increasing age, is a well-recognised concept although it has not been accurately measured in the clinical setting. The aim of this literature review is to summarise commonly used frailty screening tools, and to describe how new measurement methods have been developed recently.

methodsSeveral frailty measurement tools including the most cited and newly developed scales have been described in this review. We searched the MEDLINE using the search terms; "frailty score, scale, tool, instrument, index, phenotype" and then summarised selected tools for physical, cognitive, emotional and co-morbidity domains.

resultsThe most cited frailty measurement methods developed from 1999 to 2005 are primarily criteria for physical frailty (e.g., frailty phenotype). More recently developed tools (e.g., triad of impairment and multidimensional frailty score) consider cognitive and emotional domains in addition to physical deficit in measuring frailty. Co-morbidity has also been considered as a domain of frailty in several measurement tools.

conclusionAlthough frailty tools have traditionally assessed physical capability, cognitive and emotional impairment often co-exist in older adults and may have shared origins. Therefore, newer tools which provide a composite measure of frailty may be more relevant for future use.

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentemotional impairmentfrailtyphysical deficit

Identifiers

PMID31011046
PMCPMC6371193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.