Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31010878›Full record

ReviewDiabetes2019

Functional Implications of DNA Methylation in Adipose Biology.

Xiang Ma, Sona Kang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Beyond Deterministic Fetal Programming: Intrauterine Exposures and the Multifactorial Origins of Adiposity.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Implication of the Mediterranean diet on the human epigenome.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiang MaDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Sona KangDepartment of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA kangs@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9831-677X
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Epigenetic regulation of adipose development and remodelingR01DK116008 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Sona Kang · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK116008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The twin epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are a serious health, social, and economic issue. The dysregulation of adipose tissue biology is central to the development of these two metabolic disorders, as adipose tissue plays a pivotal role in regulating whole-body metabolism and energy homeostasis (1). Accumulating evidence indicates that multiple aspects of adipose biology are regulated, in part, by epigenetic mechanisms. The precise and comprehensive understanding of the epigenetic control of adipose tissue biology is crucial to identifying novel therapeutic interventions that target epigenetic issues. Here, we review the recent findings on DNA methylation events and machinery in regulating the developmental processes and metabolic function of adipocytes. We highlight the following points:

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdiposityAnimalsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansObesity

Identifiers

PMID31010878
PMCPMC6477906
OpenAlexW2937666953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.