Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31010190›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2019

Optimization of the Navigated TMS Mapping Algorithm for Accurate Estimation of Cortical Muscle Representation Characteristics.

Dmitry O Sinitsyn, Andrey Yu Chernyavskiy, Alexandra G Poydasheva, Ilya S Bakulin, Natalia A Suponeva, Michael A Piradov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dmitry O SinitsynDepartment of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Research Center of Neurology, 125367 Moscow, Russia. d_sinitsyn@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-9803
Andrey Yu ChernyavskiyDepartment of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Research Center of Neurology, 125367 Moscow, Russia. andrey.chernyavskiy@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8768-5855
Alexandra G PoydashevaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Research Center of Neurology, 125367 Moscow, Russia. alexandra.poydasheva@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1841-1177
Ilya S BakulinDepartment of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Research Center of Neurology, 125367 Moscow, Russia. bakulinilya@gmail.com.
Natalia A SuponevaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Research Center of Neurology, 125367 Moscow, Russia. nasu2709@mail.ru.
Michael A PiradovDepartment of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Research Center of Neurology, 125367 Moscow, Russia. mpi711@gmail.com.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 17-75-10062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) mapping of cortical muscle representations allows noninvasive assessment of the state of a healthy or diseased motor system, and monitoring changes over time. These applications are hampered by the heterogeneity of existing mapping algorithms and the lack of detailed information about their accuracy. We aimed to find an optimal motor evoked potential (MEP) sampling scheme in the grid-based mapping algorithm in terms of the accuracy of muscle representation parameters. The abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscles of eight healthy subjects were mapped three times on consecutive days using a seven-by-seven grid with ten stimuli per cell. The effect of the MEP variability on the parameter accuracy was assessed using bootstrapping. The accuracy of representation parameters increased with the number of stimuli without saturation up to at least ten stimuli per cell. The detailed sampling showed that the between-session representation area changes in the absence of interventions were significantly larger than the within-session fluctuations and thus could not be explained solely by the trial-to-trial variability of MEPs. The results demonstrate that the number of stimuli has no universally optimal value and must be chosen by balancing the accuracy requirements with the mapping time constraints in a given problem.

Indexed as

accuracybootstrappingcortical muscle representationnavigated transcranial magnetic stimulationTMS motor mappingvariability

Identifiers

PMID31010190
PMCPMC6523347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.