Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31010163›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Natural and Artificial Sweeteners and High Fat Diet Modify Differential Taste Receptors, Insulin, and TLR4-Mediated Inflammatory Pathways in Adipose Tissues of Rats.

Mónica Sánchez-Tapia, Jonathan Martínez-Medina, Armando R Tovar, Nimbe Torres

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impacts of non-nutritive sweeteners on the human microbiome.Immunometabolism (Cobham, Surrey) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Sweet triterpenoid glycoside fromCurrent research in food science · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mónica Sánchez-TapiaDepartamento de Fisiología de la Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México City 14080, Mexico. qfbmoniktc@gmail.com.
Jonathan Martínez-MedinaDepartamento de Fisiología de la Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México City 14080, Mexico. jonathan.martinez@comunidad.unam.mx.
Armando R TovarDepartamento de Fisiología de la Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México City 14080, Mexico. armando.tovarp@incmnsz.mx.
Nimbe TorresDepartamento de Fisiología de la Nutrición, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México City 14080, Mexico. nimbe.torrest@incmnsz.mx.ORCID 0000-0002-1741-0984
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CB-257339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is difficult to know if the cause for obesity is the type of sweetener, high fat (HF) content, or the combination of sweetener and fat. The purpose of the present work was to study different types of sweeteners; in particular, steviol glycosides (SG), glucose, fructose, sucrose, brown sugar, honey, SG + sucrose (SV), and sucralose on the functionality of the adipocyte. Male Wistar rats were fed for four months with different sweeteners or sweetener with HF added. Taste receptors T1R2 and T1R3 were differentially expressed in the tongue and intestine by sweeteners and HF. The combination of fat and sweetener showed an additive effect on circulating levels of GIP and GLP-1 except for honey, SG, and brown sugar. In adipose tissue, sucrose and sucralose stimulated TLR4, and c-Jun N-terminal (JNK). The combination of HF with sweeteners increased NFκB, with the exception of SG and honey. Honey kept the insulin signaling pathway active and the smallest adipocytes in white (WAT) and brown (BAT) adipose tissue and the highest expression of adiponectin, PPARγ, and UCP-1 in BAT. The addition of HF reduced mitochondrial branched-chain amino transferase (BCAT2) branched-chain keto acid dehydrogenase E1 (BCKDH) and increased branched chain amino acids (BCAA) levels by sucrose and sucralose. Our data suggests that the consumption of particular honey maintained functional adipocytes despite the consumption of a HF diet.

Indexed as

Diet, High-Fat3-Methyl-2-Oxobutanoate Dehydrogenase (Lipoamide)AdiponectinAdipose TissueAnimalsDietary FatsDietary SugarsHoneyIncretinsInflammationInsulinMaleMembrane Transport ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsMonocarboxylic Acid TransportersNF-kappa B3-Methyl-2-Oxobutanoate Dehydrogenase (Lipoamide)AdiponectinBcat2 protein, ratDietary FatsDietary SugarsIncretinsInsulinMembrane Transport ProteinsMitochondrial ProteinsMonocarboxylic Acid TransportersMpc1 protein, ratNF-kappa BPPAR gammaSolute Carrier ProteinsSucroseSweetening AgentsToll-Like Receptor 4TransaminasestrichlorosucroseUcp1 protein, ratUncoupling Protein 1adipose tissueBCAAincretinsinsulin signalingsweetenerstaste receptorsTLR4

Identifiers

PMID31010163
PMCPMC6520815
OpenAlexW2939856018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.