Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31010074›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

ChimeraMiner: An Improved Chimeric Read Detection Pipeline and Its Application in Single Cell Sequencing.

Na Lu, Junji Li, Changwei Bi, Jing Guo, Yuhan Tao, Kaihao Luan, Jing Tu, Zuhong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chimera: The spoiler in multiple displacement amplification.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Na LuState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. nlu@seu.edu.cn.
Junji LiState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. ljjboris@gmail.com.
Changwei BiState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. bichwei@163.com.
Jing GuoState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. lebrowngj@126.com.
Yuhan TaoState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. 220174561@seu.edu.cn.
Kaihao LuanState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. 213161290@seu.edu.cn.
Jing TuState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. jtu@seu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-1310-5915
Zuhong LuState Key Lab of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. zhlu@seu.edu.cn.

Funding

Joint Research Fund for State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics and Zhongda Hospital NANational Natural Science Foundation of China 61571121the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the most widely-used single cell whole genome amplification (WGA) approach, multiple displacement amplification (MDA) has a superior performance, due to the high-fidelity and processivity of phi29 DNA polymerase. However, chimeric reads, generated in MDA, cause severe disruption in many single-cell studies. Herein, we constructed ChimeraMiner, an improved chimeric read detection pipeline for analyzing the sequencing data of MDA and classified the chimeric sequences. Two datasets (MDA1 and MDA2) were used for evaluating and comparing the efficiency of ChimeraMiner and previous pipeline. Under the same hardware condition, ChimeraMiner spent only 43.4% (43.8% for MDA1 and 43.0% for MDA2) processing time. Respectively, 24.4 million (6.31%) read pairs out of 773 million reads, and 17.5 million (6.62%) read pairs out of 528 million reads were accurately classified as chimeras by ChimeraMiner. In addition to finding 83.60% (17,639,371) chimeras, which were detected by previous pipelines, ChimeraMiner screened 6,736,168 novel chimeras, most of which were missed by the previous pipeline. Applying in single-cell datasets, all three types of chimera were discovered in each dataset, which introduced plenty of false positives in structural variation (SV) detection. The identification and filtration of chimeras by ChimeraMiner removed most of the false positive SVs (83.8%). ChimeraMiner revealed improved efficiency in discovering chimeric reads, and is promising to be widely used in single-cell sequencing.

Indexed as

SoftwareChimeraComputational BiologyGenome, HumanHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisWhole Genome Sequencingchimeric sequence readMDAsingle cell sequencingstructural variation detection

Identifiers

PMID31010074
PMCPMC6515389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.