Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31010043›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Defining the Genetic Basis of Plant⁻Endophytic Bacteria Interactions.

Artur Pinski, Alexander Betekhtin, Katarzyna Hupert-Kocurek, Luis A J Mur, Robert Hasterok

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
21.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 163 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Response of the Endophytic Microbiome inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Complete genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dual RNA-seq of maize andFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Artur PinskiDepartment of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland. apinski@us.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-9539
Alexander BetekhtinDepartment of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland. alexander.betekhtin@us.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6146-1669
Katarzyna Hupert-KocurekDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland. katarzyna.hupert-kocurek@us.edu.pl.
Luis A J MurInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth, Wales SY23 3DA, UK. lum@aber.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-9817
Robert HasterokDepartment of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland. robert.hasterok@us.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-6667-2721
University of Silesia in Katowice · PLAberystwyth University · GB

Funding

National Science Centre, Poland DEC-2015/18/M/NZ2/00394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endophytic bacteria, which interact closely with their host, are an essential part of the plant microbiome. These interactions enhance plant tolerance to environmental changes as well as promote plant growth, thus they have become attractive targets for increasing crop production. Numerous studies have aimed to characterise how endophytic bacteria infect and colonise their hosts as well as conferring important traits to the plant. In this review, we summarise the current knowledge regarding endophytic colonisation and focus on the insights that have been obtained from the mutants of bacteria and plants as well as 'omic analyses. These show how endophytic bacteria produce various molecules and have a range of activities related to chemotaxis, motility, adhesion, bacterial cell wall properties, secretion, regulating transcription and utilising a substrate in order to establish a successful interaction. Colonisation is mediated by plant receptors and is regulated by the signalling that is connected with phytohormones such as auxin and jasmonic (JA) and salicylic acids (SA). We also highlight changes in the expression of small RNAs and modifications of the cell wall properties. Moreover, in order to exploit the beneficial plant-endophytic bacteria interactions in agriculture successfully, we show that the key aspects that govern successful interactions remain to be defined.

Indexed as

BacteriaCell WallEndophytesPlant DevelopmentPlantsSignal Transductioncolonisationcomparative genomicsendophytic bacteriametabolomicsmutantsplant interactionsproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID31010043
PMCPMC6515357
OpenAlexW2937118123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.