Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31009958›Full record

ReviewGut and liver2020

Detecting Early Pancreatic Cancer: Current Problems and Future Prospects.

Hiroyuki Matsubayashi, Hirotoshi Ishiwatari, Keiko Sasaki, Katsuhiko Uesaka, Hiroyuki Ono

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut and liver, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oral microbiome and pancreatic cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Nanomedicine for Imaging and Therapy of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroyuki MatsubayashiDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7050-2351
Hirotoshi IshiwatariDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Keiko SasakiDivision of Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Katsuhiko UesakaDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki OnoDivision of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) is currently increasing in both Korea and Japan. The 5-year survival rate of patients with PC 13.0%; however, resection with minimal invasion (tumor size: ≤10 mm) increases the 5-year survival rate to 80%. For this reason, early detection is essential, but most patients with early-stage PC are asymptomatic. Early detection of PC has been reported to require screening of high-risk individuals (HRIs), such as those with a family history of PC, inherited cancer syndromes, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, or chronic pancreatitis. Studies on screening of these HRIs have confirmed a significantly better prognosis among patients with PC who were screened than for patients with PC who were not screened. However, to date in Japan, most patients with early-stage PC diagnosed in routine clinics were not diagnosed during annual health checks or by surveillance; rather, PC was detected in these patients by incidental findings during examinations for other diseases. We need to increase the precision of the PC screening and diagnostic processes by introducing new technologies, and we need to pay greater attention to incidental clinical findings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsRepublic of KoreaRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateEarly detection of cancerIncidental findingMass screeningPancreatic neoplasmsRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31009958
PMCPMC6974337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.