Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31009930›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2019

Characterizing the clinical implementation of a novel activation-repolarization metric to identify targets for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias using computational models.

Fernando O Campos, Michele Orini, Peter Taggart, Ben Hanson, Pier D Lambiase, Bradley Porter, Christopher Aldo Rinaldi, Jaswinder Gill, Martin J Bishop

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of left ventricular function during the full cardiac cycle.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando O CamposSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michele OriniThe Heart Hospital, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter TaggartThe Heart Hospital, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ben HansonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pier D LambiaseInstitute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Electrophysiology Department, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Bradley PorterSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher Aldo RinaldiDepartment of Cardiology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jaswinder GillSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Martin J BishopSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/martin.bishop.html.
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBGuy's Hospital · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital at Westmoreland Street · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/16/81/32441Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/N011007/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of targets for catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) remains a significant challenge. VTs are often driven by re-entrant circuits resulting from a complex interaction between the front (activation) and tail (repolarization) of the electrical wavefront. Most mapping techniques do not take into account the tissue repolarization which may hinder the detection of ablation targets. The re-entry vulnerability index (RVI), a recently proposed mapping procedure, incorporates both activation and repolarization times to uncover VT circuits. The method showed potential in a series of experiments, but it still requires further development to enable its incorporation into a clinical protocol. Here, in-silico experiments were conducted to thoroughly assess RVI maps constructed under clinically-relevant mapping conditions. Within idealized as well as anatomically realistic infarct models, we show that parameters of the algorithm such as the search radius can significantly alter the specificity and sensitivity of the RVI maps. When constructed on sparse grids obtained following various placements of clinical recording catheters, RVI maps can identify vulnerable regions as long as two electrodes were placed on both sides of the line of block. Moreover, maps computed during pacing without inducing VT can reveal areas of abnormal repolarization and slow conduction but not directly vulnerability. In conclusion, the RVI algorithm can detect re-entrant circuits during VT from low resolution mapping grids resembling the clinical setting. Furthermore, RVI maps may provide information about the underlying tissue electrophysiology to guide catheter ablation without the need of inducing potentially harmful VT during the clinical procedure. Finally, the ability of the RVI maps to identify vulnerable regions with specificity in high resolution computer models could potentially improve the prediction of optimal ablation targets of simulation-based strategies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCatheter AblationComputer SimulationModels, CardiovascularTachycardia, VentricularAnimalsHumansRabbitsAblationArrhythmiaComputer simulationVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID31009930
PMCPMC6538827
OpenAlexW2925512238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.