Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31009528›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2019

Six Month Abstinence Heterogeneity in the Best Quit Study.

Harold S Javitz, Terry M Bush, Jennifer C Lovejoy, Alula J Torres, Tallie Wetzel, Ken P Wassum, Marcia M Tan, Nabil Alshurafa, Bonnie Spring

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harold S JavitzEducation Division, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Terry M BushOptum Center for Wellbeing Research, Optum, Seattle, WA USA.
Jennifer C LovejoyOptum Center for Wellbeing Research, Arivale, Inc and Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alula J TorresOptum Center for Wellbeing Research, Optum, Seattle, WA USA.
Tallie WetzelEducation Division, SRI International, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Ken P WassumOptum Center for Wellbeing Research, Optum, Seattle, WA USA.
Marcia M TanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nabil AlshurafaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bonnie SpringDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · USOptum (United States) · USSRI International · USInstitute for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control to smoking cessation quitlinesR01DA031147 · NIDA · CONSUMER WELLNESS SOLUTIONS, INC. · PI BUSH, TERRY · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the characteristics of smokers who are successful in quitting may help to increase smoking cessation rates. PURPOSE: To examine heterogeneity in cessation outcome at 6 months following smoking cessation behavioral counseling with or without weight management counseling.

methods2,540 smokers were recruited from a large quitline provider and then randomized to receive proactive smoking cessation behavioral counseling without or with two versions of weight management counseling. A Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was conducted to identify the individual pretreatment and treatment characteristics of groups of smokers with different quitting success (as measured by point prevalence of self-reported smoking of any amount at 6 months).

resultsCART analysis identified 10 subgroups ranging from 25.5% to 70.2% abstinent. The splits in the CART tree involved: the total number of counseling and control calls received, whether a smoking cessation pharmacotherapy was used, and baseline measures of cigarettes per day, confidence in quitting, expectation that the study would help the participant quit smoking, the motivation to quit, exercise minutes per week, anxiety, and lack of interest or pleasure in doing things. Costs per quitter ranged from a low of $US270 to a high of $US630. Specific treatment recommendations are made for each group.

conclusionsThese results indicate the presence of a substantial variation in abstinence following treatment, and that the total extent of contact via counseling calls of any type and baseline characteristics, rather than assigned treatment, were most important to subgroup membership and abstinence. Tailored treatments to subgroups who are at high risk for smoking following a quit attempt could increase successful smoking cessation.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdultCigarette SmokingCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareSmoking CessationAbstinenceCARTCost per quitterIntentionsRelapseSmoking cessationWeight management

Identifiers

PMID31009528
PMCPMC7309581
OpenAlexW2940970431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.