Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31009451›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

BOFdat: Generating biomass objective functions for genome-scale metabolic models from experimental data.

Jean-Christophe Lachance, Colton J Lloyd, Jonathan M Monk, Laurence Yang, Anand V Sastry, Yara Seif, Bernhard O Palsson, Sébastien Rodrigue, Adam M Feist, Zachary A King and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. ModellingCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Implementation of aComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Determination of the genome-scale metabolic network ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Metabolic modeling of host-microbe interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome-scale model development and genomic sequencing of the oleaginous cladeFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Microbiome modeling: a beginner's guide.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jean-Christophe LachanceDépartement de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3096-6995
Colton J LloydDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Jonathan M MonkDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Laurence YangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6663-7643
Anand V SastryDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8293-3909
Yara SeifDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Bernhard O PalssonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-6785
Sébastien RodrigueDépartement de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
Adam M FeistDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8630-4800
Zachary A KingDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-1499
Pierre-Étienne JacquesDépartement de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3961-294X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are mathematically structured knowledge bases of metabolism that provide phenotypic predictions from genomic information. GEM-guided predictions of growth phenotypes rely on the accurate definition of a biomass objective function (BOF) that is designed to include key cellular biomass components such as the major macromolecules (DNA, RNA, proteins), lipids, coenzymes, inorganic ions and species-specific components. Despite its importance, no standardized computational platform is currently available to generate species-specific biomass objective functions in a data-driven, unbiased fashion. To fill this gap in the metabolic modeling software ecosystem, we implemented BOFdat, a Python package for the definition of a Biomass Objective Function from experimental data. BOFdat has a modular implementation that divides the BOF definition process into three independent modules defined here as steps: 1) the coefficients for major macromolecules are calculated, 2) coenzymes and inorganic ions are identified and their stoichiometric coefficients estimated, 3) the remaining species-specific metabolic biomass precursors are algorithmically extracted in an unbiased way from experimental data. We used BOFdat to reconstruct the BOF of the Escherichia coli model iML1515, a gold standard in the field. The BOF generated by BOFdat resulted in the most concordant biomass composition, growth rate, and gene essentiality prediction accuracy when compared to other methods. Installation instructions for BOFdat are available in the documentation and the source code is available on GitHub (https://github.com/jclachance/BOFdat).

Indexed as

BiomassMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalSoftwareEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialGenomics

Identifiers

PMID31009451
PMCPMC6497307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.