Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31009397›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic imaging2019

Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Imaging.

Tara A Retson, Alexandra H Besser, Sean Sall, Daniel Golden, Albert Hsiao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Machine learning: a new era for cardiovascular pregnancy physiology and cardio-obstetrics research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Genetic counseling for hearing loss today].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tara A RetsonDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego.
Alexandra H BesserDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego.
Sean SallArterys Inc., San Francisco, CA.
Daniel GoldenArterys Inc., San Francisco, CA.
Albert HsiaoDepartment of Radiology, University of California San Diego.
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Traning Clinical Scientists in Radiological ImagingT32EB005970 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Eric Y Chang, Rebecca Ann Rakow-Penner · 2007 to 2026
$3.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB005970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in technology have always had the potential and opportunity to shape the practice of medicine, and in no medical specialty has technology been more rapidly embraced and adopted than radiology. Machine learning and deep neural networks promise to transform the practice of medicine, and, in particular, the practice of diagnostic radiology. These technologies are evolving at a rapid pace due to innovations in computational hardware and novel neural network architectures. Several cutting-edge postprocessing analysis applications are actively being developed in the fields of thoracic and cardiovascular imaging, including applications for lesion detection and characterization, lung parenchymal characterization, coronary artery assessment, cardiac volumetry and function, and anatomic localization. Cardiothoracic and cardiovascular imaging lies at the technological forefront of radiology due to a confluence of technical advances. Enhanced equipment has enabled computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scanners that can safely capture images that freeze the motion of the heart to exquisitely delineate fine anatomic structures. Computing hardware developments have enabled an explosion in computational capabilities and in data storage. Progress in software and fluid mechanical models is enabling complex 3D and 4D reconstructions to not only visualize and assess the dynamic motion of the heart, but also quantify its blood flow and hemodynamics. And now, innovations in machine learning, particularly in the form of deep neural networks, are enabling us to leverage the increasingly massive data repositories that are prevalent in the field. Here, we discuss developments in machine learning techniques and deep neural networks to highlight their likely role in future radiologic practice, both in and outside of image interpretation and analysis. We discuss the concepts of validation, generalizability, and clinical utility, as they pertain to this and other new technologies, and we reflect upon the opportunities and challenges of bringing these into daily use.

Indexed as

Machine LearningCardiovascular DiseasesCardiovascular SystemDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerThoracic DiseasesThorax

Identifiers

PMID31009397
PMCPMC7962152
OpenAlexW2910050642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.