ArticleJournal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention2019
Clinical and Demographic Trends in Cardiac Rehabilitation: 1996-2015.
Article in Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute effects of high intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training on haemostasis in patients with coronary artery disease.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- GLP-1 receptor agonists in cardiovascular disease: a guide for cardiologists.The British journal of cardiology · 2026Article
- Women's Improvements in Cardiorespiratory Fitness Following Cardiac Rehabilitation Differ by Body Mass Index Category.CJC open · 2025Article
- Mortality Benefits of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Disease Are Mediated by Comprehensive Risk Factor Modification: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Contribution of individual and cumulative frailty-related health deficits on cardiac rehabilitation completion.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Development of an integrated cardiac rehabilitation program to improve the adaptation level of patients after acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Implementation of an Appointment-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Approach: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Cardiac rehabilitation - The answer for the second chance.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Review
- Reference Standards for Cardiorespiratory Fitness by Cardiovascular Disease Category and Testing Modality: Data From FRIEND.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- The Treatment of Obesity in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A REVIEW AND PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2021Review
- Enhancing participation in cardiac rehabilitation: Focus on underserved populations.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesReview
- Exercise, Physical Activity, and Cardiometabolic Health: Insights into the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiometabolic Diseases.Cardiology in reviewArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeClinical interventions in programs such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are guided by clinical characteristics of participating patients. This study describes changes in CR participant characteristics over 20 yr.
methodsTo examine changes in patient characteristics over time, we analyzed data from 1996 to 2015 (n = 5396) garnered from a systematically and prospectively gathered database. Linear, logistic, multinomial logistic or negative binomial regression was used, as appropriate. Effects of sex and index diagnosis were considered both as interactions and as additive effects.
resultsAnalyses revealed that mean age increased (from 60.7 to 64.2 yr), enrollment of women increased (from 26.8% to 29.6%), and index diagnosis has shifted; coronary artery bypass surgery decreased (from 37.2% to 21.6%), whereas heart valve repair/replacement increased (from 0% to 10.6%). Risk factors also shifted with increases in body mass index (28.7 vs 29.6 kg/m), obesity (from 33.2% to 39.6%), hypertension (from 51% to 62.5%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (from 17.3% to 21.7%), and those reporting current smoking (from 6.6% to 8.4%). Directly measured peak aerobic capacity remained relatively stable throughout. The proportion of patients on statin therapy increased from 63.6% to 98.9%, coinciding with significant improvements in lipid levels.
conclusionsCompared with 1996, participants entering CR in 2015 were older, more overweight, and had a higher prevalence of coronary risk factors. Lipid values improved substantially concurrent with increased statin use. While the percentage of female participants increased, they continue to be underrepresented. Patients with heart valve repair/replacement now constitute 10.6% of the patients enrolled. Clinical programs need to recognize changing characteristics of attendees to best tailor interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.