ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019
Economic burden and associated factors of measles patients in Zhejiang Province, China.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Economic burden of pertussis and its determinants in Zhejiang Province, China: A cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Economic burden of measles outbreaks: a cost-of-illness study in a middle-income country in the post-elimination era.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2024Article
- Economic burden of measles and its influencing factors in Fujian, China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Economic and disease burden of Japanese encephalitis in Zhejiang Province, 2013-2018.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- The economic burden of measles in children under five in Bangladesh.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Epidemiological Investigation and Virus Tracing of a Measles Outbreak in Zhoushan Islands, China, 2019.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to figure out the economic burden of measles patients and explore the associated factors for total cost in measles cases that occurred in the year 2015 from Jiaxing, Jinhua, and Taizhou cities in Zhejiang Province, China. Direct interviews were conducted to collect information on patient expenses during treatment, including outpatient expenses, hospitalization expenses, self-treatment fees, productivity loss, and transportation fees. Descriptive epidemiological methods and chi-square tests were used to assess the direct and indirect cost of measles patients. Ordinal logistic regression was applied to explore the possible factors contributing to cost. A total of 136 measles cases were investigated and the average direct cost, indirect cost, and total cost were #747.14, #520.12, and #1,267.26, respectively. Direct cost accounted for 58.96% of the total cost, which was significantly higher than the indirect cost (P < 0.001). In 2015, 1,386 confirmed cases were reported in the Zhejiang Province, and the overall direct, indirect, and total economic burden reached #1.04 million, #0.72 million, and #1.76 million, respectively. Quality-adjusted life years for measles patient were calculated to be 76.06 in Zhejiang, 2015. Hospitalization, occupation, complication, disease duration, age, and site had a significant influence on the total cost according to ordinal logistic regression, with the maximum contribution from hospitalization. Measles resulted in heavy economic burdens, and local public health departments or community health service centers should spare no effort to maintain a high rate of vaccination coverage and protect susceptible populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.