Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31009270›Full record

ArticleJournal of global oncology2019

Advancing Cancer Research in Africa Through Early-Career Awards: The BIG Cat Initiative.

Amanda L Vogel, Jordan A Freeman, Kalina Duncan, James Alaro, John J Welch, Belmira Rodrigues, Verna Vanderpuye, Joe B Harford, Makeda Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Building Capacity for Global Cancer Research: Existing Opportunities and Future Directions.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda L VogelFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD.
Jordan A FreemanNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Kalina DuncanNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
James AlaroNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
John J WelchNational Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Belmira RodriguesAfrican Organization for Research and Training in Cancer, New York, NY.
Verna VanderpuyeAfrican Organization for Research and Training in Cancer, New York, NY.
Joe B HarfordCapacity Building for Innovation and Transformation, Potomac, MD.
Makeda WilliamsNational Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD.
National Cancer Institute · USAfrica Center · USCenter for Innovation · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USNational Institute of Mental Health · US

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe burden of cancer in Africa is growing rapidly, and increased cancer research on the continent is a critical component of an effective response. In 2010, the US National Cancer Institute, in partnership with the African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer, launched the Beginning Investigator Grant for Catalytic Research (BIG Cat) initiative to support cancer research projects conducted by early-career African investigators.

methodsTo date, BIG Cat has provided 18 awards of up to $50,000 to support 2-year cancer research projects. In 2017, the National Cancer Institute evaluated BIG Cat's early outcomes for cancer research and impacts on career development and local cancer research capacity. Data collection consisted of a review of project documentation and a survey fielded to the 12 investigators who had completed their BIG Cat awards.

resultsBIG Cat-supported research projects have generated locally relevant findings that address a range of cancer sites and multiple areas of scientific interest. The 11 survey respondents produced 43 scholarly products (e.g., publications, presentations) about findings from their BIG Cat research. They reported increases in cancer research funding applications and awards after receipt of the BIG Cat award compared with before the award. They also reported increased resources for cancer research, participation in teaching and mentoring on cancer research, and supervision of cancer research staff. Investigators identified scientific mentoring as a key facilitator of the success of their BIG Cat projects and limited time and funding as key challenges.

conclusionFindings provide early evidence that BIG Cat advanced locally relevant cancer research and facilitated career advancement and development of local cancer research capacity. Findings have implications for the design of future related efforts.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyAfricaAwards and PrizesBiomedical ResearchHumansMaleMentoringNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Research Support as TopicUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31009270
PMCPMC6528731
OpenAlexW2941177203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.