ArticleMedicine2019
Cluster analysis to define distinct clinical phenotypes among septic patients with bloodstream infections.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven cluster analysis for identifying clinical phenotypes in suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Factors for Bacteremia and Its Clinical Impact on Complicated Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Article
- Clinical applications of machine learning in the survival prediction and classification of sepsis: coagulation and heparin usage matter.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Pediatric sepsis phenotypes for enhanced therapeutics: An application of clustering to electronic health records.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022Article
- Circulatory trajectories after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Observational
- Coagulation phenotypes in sepsis and effects of recombinant human thrombomodulin: an analysis of three multicentre observational studies.Critical care (London, England) · 2021Observational
- Early Detection of Sepsis With Machine Learning Techniques: A Brief Clinical Perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Cluster-Based Analysis of Infectious Disease Occurrences Using Tensor Decomposition: A Case Study of South Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Phenotypic heterogeneity by site of infection in surgical sepsis: a prospective longitudinal study.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Article
- Different Types of Coagulase Are Associated With 28-Day Mortality in Patients WithFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- Association between sodium level trajectories and clinical prognosis in patients with sepsis: A longitudinal retrospective cohort study.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior attempts at identifying outcome determinants associated with bloodstream infection have employed a priori determined classification schemes based on readily identifiable microbiology, infection site, and patient characteristics. We hypothesized that even amongst this heterogeneous population, clinically relevant groupings can be described that transcend old a priori classifications.We applied cluster analysis to variables from three domains: patient characteristics, acuity of illness/clinical presentation and infection characteristics. We validated our clusters based on both content validity and predictive validity.Among 3715 patients with bloodstream infections from Barnes-Jewish Hospital (2008-2015), the most stable cluster arrangement occurred with the formation of 4 clusters. This clustering arrangement resulted in an approximately uniform distribution of the population: Cluster One "Surgical Outside Hospital Transfers" (21.5%), Cluster Two "Functional Immunocompromised Patients" (27.9%), Cluster Three "Women with Skin and Urinary Tract Infection" (28.7%) and Cluster Four "Acutely Sick Pneumonia" (21.8%). Staphylococcus aureus distributed primarily to Clusters Three (40%) and Four (25%), while nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria grouped mainly in Clusters Two and Four (31% and 30%). More than half of the pneumonia cases occurred in Cluster Four. Clusters One and Two contained 33% and 31% respectively of the individuals receiving inappropriate antibiotic administration. Mortality was greatest for Cluster Four (33.8%, 27.4%, 19.2%, 44.6%; P < .001), while Cluster One patients were most likely to be discharged to a nursing home.Our results support the potential for machine learning methods to identify homogenous groupings in infectious diseases that transcend old a priori classifications. These methods may allow new clinical phenotypes to be identified potentially improving the severity staging and development of new treatments for complex infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.