ArticleMedicine2019
Severity stratification and prognostic prediction of patients with acute pancreatitis at early phase: A retrospective study.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association of platelet-lymphocyte ratio with acute pancreatitis severity: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Global burden and characterization of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: results from a systematic review and a multi-center cohort study.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for primary risk stratification in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic Accuracy of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Predicting Mortality Among Acute Pancreatitis Patients:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Clinical usefulness of scoring systems to predict severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with pre and post-test probability assessment.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Pooled it
- Assessment of the course of acute pancreatitis in the light of aetiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2020Pooled it
- Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis.Disease markers · 2020Pooled it
- Serum AIM2 as a Prognostic Biomarker for Disease Severity and Delirium in Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Predicting Prolonged Length of Stay in Acute Pancreatitis: Comparison of the CRP-to-Albumin Ratio with Other Inflammatory and Immunoutritional Indices.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Predictive accuracy of clinical, laboratory, and radiological scores for severe acute pancreatitis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic Assessment of Modified EASIX (m-EASIX) at 48 Hours Predicts Adverse Outcomes in Acute Pancreatitis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Prognostic utility of red blood cell distribution width-based ratios and their individual components for mortality prediction in dogs with acute pancreatitis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Nomogram for Predicting Pancreatic Pseudocyst in Hypertriglyceridemic Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with ICU Admission and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Integrating Feature Selection, Machine Learning, and SHAP Explainability to Predict Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of acute pancreatitis severity using NLR, procalcitonin, and CT severity score: A retrospective study.Medicine · 2025Article
- Article
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severity stratification and prognostic prediction at early stage is crucial for reducing the rates of mortality of patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). We aim to investigate the predicting performance of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and red-cell distribution width (RDW) combined with severity scores (sequential organ failure assessment [SOFA], bed-side index for severity of AP [BISAP], Ranson criteria, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II [APACHE II]) for severe AP (SAP) and mortality.A total of 406 patients diagnosed with AP admitted in a tertiary teaching hospital were enrolled. Demographic information and clinical parameters were retrospectively collected and analyzed. NLR, PLR, RDW, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and AP severity scores (SOFA, BISAP, Ranson, and APACHE II) were compared between different severity groups and the survival and death group. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for SAP and 28-day mortality were calculated for each predictor using cut-off values. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis and logistic regression models were performed to compare the performance of laboratory biomarkers and severity scores.Our results showed that NLR, PLR, RDW, glucose, and BUN level of the SAP group were significantly increased compared to the mild acute pancreatitis (MAP) group on admission (P < .001). The severity of AP increased as the NLR, SOFA, BISAP, and Ranson increased (P < .01). The AUC values of NLR, PLR, RDW, BUN, SOFA, BISAP, Ranson, and APACHE II to predict SAP were 0.722, 0.621, 0.787, 0.677, 0.806, 0.841, 0.806, and 0.752, respectively, while their AUC values to predict 28-day mortality were 0.851, 0.693, 0.885, 0.765, 0.968, 0.929, 0.812, and 0.867, respectively. BISAP achieved the highest AUC, sensitivity and NPV in predicting SAP, while SOFA is the most superior in predicting mortality. The combination of BISAP + RDW achieved the highest AUC (0.872) in predicting SAP and the combination of SOFA + RDW achieved the highest AUC (0.976) in predicting mortality. RDW (OR = 1.739), SOFA (OR = 1.554), BISAP (OR = 2.145), and Ranson (OR = 1.434) were all independent risk factors for predicting SAP, while RDW (OR = 7.361) and hematocrit (OR = 0.329) were independent risk factors for predicting mortality by logistic regression model.NLR, PLR, RDW, and BUN indicated good predictive value for SAP and mortality, while RDW had the highest discriminatory capacity. RDW is a convenient and reliable indicator for prediction not only SAP, but also mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.