ArticleMedicine2019
Diagnostic challenges of spinal gout: A case series.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spinal Gout: A Rare but Serious Mimicker of Spinal Pathology-Report of Two Cases.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- A unique presentation of acute tophaceous gout in the lumbar spine causing cauda equina syndrome.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Tophaceous spinal gout in a young man with complete spinal cord injury.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Spinal gout diagnosis in chiropractic practice: narrative review.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2023Article
- Relationship between hyperuricemia with deposition and sexual dysfunction in males and females.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2022Review
- Beyond Medical Treatment: Surgical Treatment of Gout.Current rheumatology reports · 2020Review
- Understanding spinal gout: A comprehensive study of 88 cases and their clinical implications.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal gout is rarely encountered in clinical practice, is easily misdiagnosed, and often remains undiagnosed. This paper aims to provide some clues that are the salient diagnostic features of spinal gout, particularly axial pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy, as determined on the basis of our experience with a few cases as well as a literature review.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of 5 patients that were treated for axial pain and neurological symptoms associated with spinal gout between 2014 and 2017 in our hospital. Herein, we systematically describe the clinical characteristics of 5 patients with spinal gout. The 5 patients included 4 men and 1 woman, aged between 24 and 75 years. The most common clinical presentation included spinal pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Four of the 5 patients had a history of gout and elevated serum uric acid levels.
resultsFour patients underwent surgery, while the remaining patient underwent conservative treatment and biopsy due to poor general condition. Pathological examination of the surgical samples in the 4 surgical cases and the biopsy sample in the remaining case confirmed the presence of spinal gout tophi. The neurological symptoms of all 5 patients were relieved after treatment.
conclusionDue to its rarity and lack of typical defining criteria, the diagnosis of spinal gout is quite difficult. We recommend that patients presenting with axial pain; radicular pain or myelopathy; and especially high uric acid levels, with or without a history of gout, should be evaluated for spinal gout. Timely pathological examination of surgical or biopsy samples would help confirm the diagnosis and enable practitioners to provide the appropriate treatment to prevent disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.