Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31008644›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2019

Neural valuation of antidrinking campaigns and risky peer influence in daily life.

Christin Scholz, Bruce P Doré, Nicole Cooper, Emily B Falk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Social networks and neural receptivity to persuasive health messages.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christin ScholzAmsterdam School of Communication Research.ORCID 0000-0001-6567-7504
Bruce P DoréAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
Nicole CooperAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School for Communication, Marketing Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
California University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

UPENN TCORS: Tobacco Product Messaging in a Complex Communication EnvironmentP50CA179546 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HORNIK, ROBERT C., LERMAN, CARYN · 2013 to 2017
$18.7M
Can neuroscience dramatically improve our ability to design health communicationsDP2DA035156 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FALK, EMILY · 2012 to 2012
$2.3M
FDA Center for Tobacco ProductsHopeLabNational Institutes of HealthNCI NIH HHS P50 CA179546NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA035156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHealth behavior is affected by competing sources of influence like media messages and peers. In the context of alcohol consumption, college students are targeted by antidrinking media messages, but tend to have proalcohol conversations with peers. How do humans integrate competing sources of influence on daily behavior? We observed individuals under exposure to antialcohol media messages and proalcohol conversations and tested a "common neural value" account of how contradictory influences are integrated to affect behavior.

methodsParticipants were instructed to cognitively regulate responses to antidrinking media messages while undergoing fMRI at baseline. Individual differences in success in message-consistent or -derogating regulation were indexed by changes in activity within the neural valuation system (ventral striatum/VS, ventromedial prefrontal cortex/VMPFC), providing a proxy for success in finding value in message-consistent/-derogating engagement. To measure peer influence, we tracked daily drinking-related conversations and drinking behavior for 30 days using mobile electronic diaries.

resultsPeer conversations, on average, were positive toward drinking. More positive conversations led to more future drinking, particularly for participants who showed greater neural value signals when derogating antidrinking media. Susceptibility to risky peer influence decreased with increasing success in up-regulating message-consistent neural valuation responses to antidrinking media. Neural effects were driven by VS-activity.

conclusionsResults are consistent with a dynamic value integration process where contradictory influences inform a common neural value signal. Reductions in the value of a behavior (through antidrinking campaigns) may buffer against future value increases after exposure to competing influences (proalcohol peers) with important real-world consequences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Health Risk BehaviorsPeer GroupPeer InfluenceAdultAlcohol DrinkingAlcohol Drinking in CollegeCommunicationFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotivationPregnancyStudentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31008644
PMCPMC6653645
OpenAlexW2941613348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.