Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31008631›Full record

ArticleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology2019

Utilization of and barriers to treatment among suicide decedents: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience Among Servicemembers (Army STARRS).

Kelly L Zuromski, Catherine L Dempsey, Tsz Hin Hinz Ng, Charlotte A Riggs-Donovan, David A Brent, Steven G Heeringa, Ronald C Kessler, Murray B Stein, Robert J Ursano, David Benedek and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly L ZuromskiDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-898X
Catherine L DempseyCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences.
Tsz Hin Hinz NgCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences.
Charlotte A Riggs-DonovanCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0003-4558-4081
David A BrentDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
Steven G HeeringaInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School.
Murray B SteinDepartment of Psychiatry and Family Medicine & Public Health, University of California, San Diego.
Robert J UrsanoCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences.
David BenedekCenter for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences.
Matthew K NockDepartment of Psychology.
Unifor · NOHarvard University · USUniversity of California System · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Modifiable Risk and Protective Factors for Suicidal Behaviors in the US ArmyU01MH087981 · NIMH · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI STEIN, MURRAY B., URSANO, ROBERT J. · 2009 to 2013
$65.0M
Department of DefenseDepartment of the ArmyNIMH NIH HHS L30 MH117722NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH087981Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health AffairsU.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine suicide decedents' use of mental health treatment and perceived barriers to initiating and maintaining treatment.

methodWe used a psychological autopsy study conducted as part of the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience Among Servicemembers (Army STARRS) that compared suicide decedents (n = 135) to soldiers in two control conditions: those propensity-score-matched on known sociodemographic and Army history variables (n = 137) and those with a history of suicidal thoughts in the past 12 months (n = 118). Informants were next of kin and Army supervisors.

resultsResults revealed that suicide decedents were significantly more likely to be referred to services and to use more intensive treatments (e.g., medication, overnight stay in hospital) than propensity-matched controls. However, decedents also were more likely to perceive significant barriers to treatment-seeking. All differences observed in the current study were between propensity-matched controls and decedents, with no observed differences between suicide ideators and decedents.

conclusionsMany suicide decedents used some form of mental health care at some point in their lives; however, they also were more likely than propensity-matched controls to perceive barriers that may have prevented service use. The lack of differences between suicide ideators and decedents suggests that more information is needed, beyond knowledge of treatment utilization or perceived barriers, to identify and intervene on those at highest risk for suicide. These findings underscore the importance of reducing attitudinal barriers that may deter suicidal soldiers from seeking treatment, and also improving risk detection among those who are attending treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalSuicidal IdeationAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMilitary PersonnelPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychotherapyRisk AssessmentSuicide

Identifiers

PMID31008631
PMCPMC6625932
OpenAlexW2941404719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.