Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31008570›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2019

Machine Learning with Optical Phase Signatures for Phenotypic Profiling of Cell Lines.

Van K Lam, Thanh Nguyen, Thuc Phan, Byung-Min Chung, George Nehmetallah, Christopher B Raub

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digital Holographic Microscopy for Phenotypic Profiling of Adherent Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Digital Holographic Microscopy to Assess Cell Behavior.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Morphology, Motility, and Cytoskeletal Architecture of Breast Cancer Cells Depend on Keratin 19 and Substrate.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Automation, Monitoring, and Standardization of Cell Product Manufacturing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Van K LamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
Thanh NguyenDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
Thuc PhanDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
Byung-Min ChungDepartment of Biology, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
George NehmetallahDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
Christopher B RaubDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0001-9487-0979
University of America · US

Funding

Mechanism and Impact of an Interaction Between Keratin 19 and a Regulator of Gene ExpressionR15CA213071 · NCI · CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA · PI CHUNG, BYUNG MIN · 2018 to 2018
$473k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA213071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust and reproducible profiling of cell lines is essential for phenotypic screening assays. The goals of this study were to determine robust and reproducible optical phase signatures of cell lines for classification with machine learning and to correlate optical phase parameters to motile behavior. Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) reconstructed phase maps of cells from two pairs of cancer and non-cancer cell lines. Seventeen image parameters were extracted from each cell's phase map, used for linear support vector machine learning, and correlated to scratch wound closure and Boyden chamber chemotaxis. The classification accuracy was between 90% and 100% for the six pairwise cell line comparisons. Several phase parameters correlated with wound closure rate and chemotaxis across the four cell lines. The level of cell confluence in culture affected phase parameters in all cell lines tested. Results indicate that optical phase features of cell lines are a robust set of quantitative data of potential utility for phenotypic screening and prediction of motile behavior. © 2019 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Indexed as

Cell LineMachine LearningCell Line, TumorCell MovementChemotaxisEpithelial CellsHolographyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMesodermMicroscopycell linechemotaxisholographymachine learningwound healing

Identifiers

PMID31008570
PMCPMC7068951
OpenAlexW2940544277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.