Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31008285›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2016

Theophylline as an add-on to thrombolytic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke (TEA-Stroke): A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-centre phase II study.

Boris Modrau, Niels Hjort, Leif Østergaard, Kim Mouridsen, Grethe Andersen, Flemming Winther Bach

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Boris ModrauDepartment of Neurology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Niels HjortDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Leif ØstergaardDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kim MouridsenCentre of Functional Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University/Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Grethe AndersenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Flemming Winther BachDepartment of Neurology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKAalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly reperfusion of brain tissue at risk of injury (penumbra salvage) is crucial in treating acute ischaemic stroke. Neuroprotective agents may extend the time window for the reperfusion. The vasoactive agent theophylline redistributes the perfusion to ischaemic brain tissue and thus reduces brain damage, brain tissue oedema and mortality in animal stroke models. Furthermore, treatment with theophylline has been shown to result in considerable and rapid clinical improvement, albeit only temporary, in some stroke patients.We hypothesize that treatment with theophylline will improve the collateral supply in acute ischaemic brain tissue and thus facilitate reperfusion despite proximal vessel occlusion. The primary study objective is to evaluate whether theophylline is safe and efficient in acute ischaemic stroke patients as an add-on to thrombolytic therapy.

methodsThe TEA-Stroke Trial is a two-centre, proof of concept phase II clinical study with a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled design. One hundred and twenty patients with acute ischaemic stroke and significant perfusion-diffusion mismatch, as determined by magnetic resonance imaging, are randomized 1:1 to either theophylline or placebo as an add-on to standard thrombolytic therapy. STUDY OUTCOME: The dual primary outcome measures include penumbra salvage (penumbral tissue not developing into infarcted tissue) and clinical improvement at the 24-h follow-up. DISCUSSION: Results from studies of theophylline in stroke animal models, clinical case series and randomized clinical trials are controversial. A Cochrane analysis from 2004 concluded that there was not enough evidence to assess whether theophylline is safe and improves outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. The TEA-Stroke Trial will clarify whether theophylline as an add-on to standard thrombolytic therapy improves penumbra salvage with a reduced risk of reperfusion damage, reduced final infarct size, and improved clinical outcome.

Indexed as

acute stroke therapyclinical trialischaemic strokemagnetic resonance imagingneuroprotectionprotocolsrecombinant tissue plasminogen activatorreperfusionStroketheophylline

Identifiers

PMID31008285
PMCPMC6301252
OpenAlexW2530933906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.