Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31008245›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2016

Delivering Difficult News and Improving Family Communication: Simulation for Neonatal-Perinatal Fellows.

Danielle Janice-Woods Reed, Jotishna Sharma

Abstract readNews
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Breaking Bad News: A Simulation-Based Training Program for OB/GYN Residents.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Newborn Care Curriculum: Palliative Care for the Newborn.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danielle Janice-Woods ReedNeonatologist, Children's Mercy-Kansas City.
Jotishna SharmaNeonatologist, Children's Mercy-Kansas City.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis 3-hour simulation module provides a safe situation for neonatal-perinatal fellows to learn communication techniques and develop skills for delivering difficult news to patients' families. These skills are critical for a practicing neonatologist in an academic or private-practice setting yet are often underrepresented in the educational content of training programs. This module is intended for fellows who have had basic communication skills instruction, as well as interactions with parents as part of their pediatric residency training.

methodsThe fellows practice delivering difficult news by interacting with standardized parents in scenarios designed for one to three learners at a time. Each scenario runs for approximately 10 to 15 minutes and is followed by a 25- to 30-minute debriefing. Those not participating in the scenario view the simulation in real-time video broadcast from another room so they can learn from the scenario and participate in the debriefing. The module also includes 10 to 15 minutes for discussion of literature. This publication includes an introductory slide presentation and a comprehensive compilation of communication recommendations from attending neonatologists. Also included are scripts for the standardized parents, background information for learners, guidelines and suggestions for discussion during the debriefing, and an evaluation form.

resultsThis module has been incorporated into the yearly simulation curriculum for our neonatal-perinatal fellowship. After completing the module, fellows have reported feeling more comfortable with delivering difficult news. The average score in fellows' comfort level for having these conversations rose from 5.8 to 7.5 on a 10-point scale. DISCUSSION: This module was designed for use in a perinatal-neonatal fellowship training program, but it could be used in all pediatric residencies, as well as for support staff training (social work, nursing, chaplaincy) with the use of a confederate physician.

Indexed as

CommunicationDifficult NewsNeonatal-PerinatalSimulationStandardized Parents

Identifiers

PMID31008245
PMCPMC6464477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.