Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31008013›Full record

ReviewCurrent hepatology reports2019

The Use of Biologics in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

Kate D Lynch, Satish Keshav, Roger W Chapman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current hepatology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [RMD open · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Current Therapeutics in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of Vedolizumab in Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2020
    Article
  10. An update on treatment options for primary sclerosing cholangitis.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kate D LynchTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Level 5, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK.
Satish KeshavTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Level 5, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK.
Roger W ChapmanTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Level 5, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU UK.
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBiologics are well established in the treatment of many immuno-inflammatory diseases including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, although primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is closely associated with IBD, the role of biologics in PSC remains uncertain. Many new biologics are becoming available to treat IBD, and this review aims to use the experience of biologics in PSC so far to guide more effective evaluation of emerging therapies in the future. RECENT

findingsAntibodies to TNF-α were the first biologics used in IBD, and retrospective analysis suggests that they may have some benefit in PSC, even though an early randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed no effect. Mechanistic studies suggest that TNF-α may have a pathogenic role in PSC. An antibody to integrin α4β7 is effective in IBD, and there are emerging data on its effects in PSC, although no RCT data are available. Mechanistic studies suggest that interrupting the migration of lymphocytes is relevant in PSC. Two biologics, targeting vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1), and lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2) have been tested in RCTs. The trial of anti-VAP1 is ongoing, whilst the anti-LOXL2 trial was negative. SUMMARY: Anti-TNF antibodies may benefit PSC when used to treat concomitant IBD, and this may be a direct effect on the liver in a subgroup of patients, or may be an indirect effect of treating IBD. Similarly, anti-integrin therapy may benefit a subset of patients with IBD and PSC. RCTs could decide the role of emerging biologics in PSC, although future trials should be guided by biomarkers that could predict response to the pathway being targeted.

Indexed as

Crohn’s diseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseIntegrin alpha4beta7Primary sclerosing cholangitisTNF-αUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID31008013
PMCPMC6445403
OpenAlexW2921679772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.