Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31007887›Full record

Articlei-Perception

Neuroimaging Findings on Amodal Completion: A Review.

Jordy Thielen, Sander E Bosch, Tessa M van Leeuwen, Marcel A J van Gerven, Rob van Lier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of Partial Occlusion on Response Dynamics and Interregional Processing within Primate Superior Temporal Sulcus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Confidence in auditory perceptual completion.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025
    Article
  6. Frontotemporal network contribution to occluded face processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jordy ThielenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-0367
Sander E BoschRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Tessa M van LeeuwenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marcel A J van GervenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Rob van LierRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4705-5725
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amodal completion is the phenomenon of perceiving completed objects even though physically they are partially occluded. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the results obtained from a variety of neuroimaging studies on the neural correlates of amodal completion. We discuss whether low-level and high-level cortical areas are implicated in amodal completion; provide an overview of how amodal completion unfolds over time while dissociating feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes; and discuss how amodal completion is represented at the neuronal level. The involvement of low-level visual areas such as V1 and V2 is not yet clear, while several high-level structures such as the lateral occipital complex and fusiform face area seem invariant to occlusion of objects and faces, respectively, and several motor areas seem to code for object permanence. The variety of results on the timing of amodal completion hints to a mixture of feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes. We discuss whether the invisible parts of the occluded object are represented as if they were visible, contrary to a high-level representation. While plenty of questions on amodal completion remain, this review presents an overview of the neuroimaging findings reported to date, summarizes several insights from computational models, and connects research of other perceptual completion processes such as modal completion. In all, it is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.

Indexed as

amodal completionEEGfMRIfunctional neuroimagingMEGocclusionSUR

Identifiers

PMID31007887
PMCPMC6457032
OpenAlexW2939135421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.