Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31007807›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2019

BAYESIAN LATENT HIERARCHICAL MODEL FOR TRANSCRIPTOMIC META-ANALYSIS TO DETECT BIOMARKERS WITH CLUSTERED META-PATTERNS OF DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION SIGNALS.

Zhiguang Huo, Chi Song, George Tseng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Transcriptomic congruence analysis for evaluating model organisms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhiguang HuoDepartment of Biostatistics University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 zhuo@ufl.edu.
Chi SongDivision of Biostatistics College of Public Health The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 song.1188@osu.edu.
George TsengDepartment of Biostatistics, Human Genetics and Computational Biology University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15261 ctseng@pitt.edu.

Funding

Power calculation and design issues in next-generation sequencingR01CA190766 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TSENG, GEORGE C. · 2015 to 2018
$876k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the rapid development of high-throughput experimental techniques and fast-dropping prices, many transcriptomic datasets have been generated and accumulated in the public domain. Meta-analysis combining multiple transcriptomic studies can increase the statistical power to detect disease-related biomarkers. In this paper, we introduce a Bayesian latent hierarchical model to perform transcriptomic meta-analysis. This method is capable of detecting genes that are differentially expressed (DE) in only a subset of the combined studies, and the latent variables help quantify homogeneous and heterogeneous differential expression signals across studies. A tight clustering algorithm is applied to detected biomarkers to capture differential meta-patterns that are informative to guide further biological investigation. Simulations and three examples, including a microarray dataset from metabolism-related knockout mice, an RNA-seq dataset from HIV transgenic rats, and cross-platform datasets from human breast cancer, are used to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.

Indexed as

Bayesian hierarchical modelDirichlet processmeta-analysistranscriptomic differential analysis

Identifiers

PMID31007807
PMCPMC6472949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.