ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2019
Optimization of CRT programming using non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging to assess the acute electrical effects of multipoint pacing.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technical development and feasibility of a reusable vest to integrate cardiovascular magnetic resonance with electrocardiographic imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Observational
- Combination of personalized computational modeling and machine learning for optimization of left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Study protocol: MyoFit46-the cardiac sub-study of the MRC National Survey of Health and Development.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Fusion Pacing with Biventricular, Left Ventricular-only and Multipoint Pacing in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy: Latest Evidence and Strategies for Use.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2021Review
- Clinical Utility of Body Surface Potential Mapping in CRT Patients.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2021Review
- Multipoint left ventricular pacing as an addition to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a bridge to the holy grail?American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2021Review
- Multisite pacing via a quadripolar lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2019Review
- Optimization of CRT programming using non-invasive electrocardiographic imaging to assess the acute electrical effects of multipoint pacing.Journal of arrhythmia · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimQuadripolar lead technology and multi-point pacing (MPP) are important clinical adjuncts in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacing aimed at reducing the rate of non-response to therapy. Mixed results have been achieved using MPP and it is critical to identify which patients require this approach and how to configure their MPP stimulation, in order to achieve optimal electrical resynchronization. METHODS &
resultsWe sought to investigate whether electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi), using the CARDIOINSIGHT
conclusionsOur work suggests a potential role for ECGi in the optimization of non-responders to CRT, as it allows the fusion of activation maps and scar analysis above and beyond interrogation of the 12 lead ECG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.