ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Too much of anything is bad: An unusual case of a stuck endotracheal tube with deflated cuff.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Failure of tracheal tube removal after surgery: a case report.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2026Article
- All India Difficult Airway Association 2025 guidelines for extubation of the "at-risk" airway.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Article
- Unexpected difficult extubation of double lumen bronchial intubation: a case report.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Article
- Comment on a published article: Too much of anything is bad: An unusual case of a stuck endotracheal tube with deflated cuff.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
- Increasing number of intubation attempts in paediatrics - The issue is tube size or the cuff.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- In response to the comment on too much of anything is bad: An unusual case of a stuck endotracheal tube with deflated cuff.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.