ArticleThe plant pathology journal2019
Antimicrobial Activity of Various Parts of Tomato Plants Varied with Different Solvent Extracts.
Article in The plant pathology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Valorization of Tomato Leaves: Optimization of Eco-Friendly Phenolic Extraction and Assessment of Biological Activities.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Box-Behnken Design Optimization of Green Extraction from Tomato Aerial Parts and Axillary Shoots for Enhanced Recovery of Rutin and Complementary Bioactive Compounds.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Harnessing nature's arsenal: sustainable plant-based strategies for phytopathogen control.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Antibacterial Activity of PeruvianInternational journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Phytochemical Study of Ethanol Extract ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Use ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Anti-Fungal Activity ofACS omega · 2022Article
- ControllingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The antimicrobial activity of acetone, hexane, dichloromethane, and methanol extracts from leaves, stems, immature green fruits, and red fruits of tomato plants was examined against six phytopathogens. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the acetonic extracts from these four plant parts was lower than that of the other solvents. Among the acetonic extracts, tomato leaves had a lower MIC than the other tomato parts. The acetonic extract from tomato leaves was therefore selected as a source of antimicrobial substances. The acetonic extract from tomato leaves inhibited mycelial growth of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.